Justin,

    Sorry for that, those classes were written by me since 2.7.6 because
I make a mistake using the wrong template code with the different headers.
I have refactored those classes with the right license headers.

Kind regards,
Mercy

On Mon, Mar 23, 2020 at 11:58 AM Ian Luo <[email protected]> wrote:

> Justin,
>
> That may be the case but why does it have that copyright line? To me that
> > implies this files come from somewhere else, if that is the case we need
> to
> > know where they come form if if they were modified by the Dubbo team.
> >
>
> Very good question, we are trying to contact the original author for the
> same question.
>
> Thanks,
> -Ian.
>
>
> On Sat, Mar 21, 2020 at 8:15 AM Justin Mclean <[email protected]>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > > It does have the different license header than others, but I think it
> is
> > > fine. Pls. let me know if it is a show stopper for the current release.
> >
> > See ASF header policy [1] ("note that there should be no copyright notice
> > in the header") and policy on 3rd party files [2].
> >
> > > These files are originally made by Dubbo team.
> >
> > That may be the case but why does it have that copyright line? To me that
> > implies this files come from somewhere else, if that is the case we need
> to
> > know where they come form if if they were modified by the Dubbo team.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Justin
> >
> > 1. https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#headers
> > 2. https://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html#3party
>


-- 

*Mercy Ma*
GMail:[email protected]
Yahoo: [email protected]
Wetchat: mercyblitz-1985
Twitter : @mercyblitz <http://twitter.com/mercyblitz>
Blog    : https://mercyblitz.github.io/

Reply via email to