Sorry for no public records for discussing issue template.
We will keep everything important recorded in mail list in the future.

Thanks!

Zhang Wenli
http://zhangwenli.com


Dave Fisher <[email protected]> 于2019年3月1日周五 下午1:59写道:

> The Apache Way is to make sure that any decisions made in an “offline”
> conversation be brought back to dev@ mailing list. This will allow
> everyone interested including those who have little time to keep informed.
>
> This then becomes an easily searchable archive of the project’s decisions
> which the Foundation maintains in its permanent records. In preparing for
> one of my talks at COSCON I was searching back over 15 years ago to refresh
> my memory of the POI project’s history. If decisions were somewhere else
> that history would be lost.
>
> Consider that a year from now someone new is interested in ECharts they
> can read the email archives and easily follow along.
>
> If the project wants to use slack that is available. I know of one project
> that sends all the conversations for a week to its dev@ mailing list. I
> think gitter is ok, but I’ve never used it.
>
> Regards,
> Dave
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> > On Feb 28, 2019, at 9:37 PM, Ovilia <[email protected]> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks, Dave.
> >
> > I actually would like to know if we could have a more informal and short
> > conversation form rather than mail list. Because we usually have to
> write a
> > long email to state our point of view. And this may take too much time
> for
> > some cases.
> > I'm not sure if ASF would disapprove on this.
> >
> > Here's a description about slack: https://slack.com/features
> >
> > Zhang Wenli
> > http://zhangwenli.com
> >
> >
> > Dave Fisher <[email protected]> 于2019年3月1日周五 下午1:30写道:
> >
> >> Hi -
> >>
> >> Sent from my iPhone
> >>
> >>> On Feb 28, 2019, at 9:24 PM, Ovilia <[email protected]> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I would also like to know the opinions of our mentors.
> >>> Does ASF suggest we have the discussion in something like slack, or
> >> should
> >>> it always be in the mail list for more people to access?
> >>
> >> The Mailing List allows for global asynchronous communication.
> >>
> >> A project may have multiple Git repositories. If there is trouble using
> >> Apache Git facilities then that needs discussion too.
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Dave
> >>>
> >>> Zhang Wenli
> >>> http://zhangwenli.com
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Ovilia <[email protected]> 于2019年3月1日周五 下午1:18写道:
> >>>
> >>>> Hi Clement.
> >>>>
> >>>> Thanks for being interested in participation.
> >>>>
> >>>> What kind of discussion do you mean?
> >>>>
> >>>> If you wish to contribute code, you may filter issues labeled with
> "bug"
> >>>> [1], "enhancement" or "new-feature".
> >>>> If a "bug" issue is not labeled with a "pending" tag, it is checked by
> >> our
> >>>> committers to be a bug and should be fixed.
> >>>> As for "enhancement" or "new-feature", I guess you should send an
> email
> >> to
> >>>> the dev mail list asking if this should be supported for now. This is
> >>>> because some feature requests are used in a limited scenio, so we
> should
> >>>> discuss about whether we should provide for all developers and
> increase
> >> the
> >>>> package size.
> >>>> I also created a GitHub project [3] containing issues that are easier
> to
> >>>> be fixed. So they are suggested for the beginners.
> >>>> You may also filter with "en" tags for English discription. With the
> >> help
> >>>> of the new issue helper, the "en" tag is created automatically. But
> for
> >>>> older issues, we may not have the effort to mark them all.
> >>>> I'm working on the document about this information. And it will be
> >>>> available in GitHub document later.
> >>>>
> >>>> If it's about a bigger plan, like what's the next step we should take
> >>>> (like features for next primary version v5.0.0), I guess it's the dev
> >> mail
> >>>> list for now. I'm not sure if we should use something like slack [2]
> or
> >>>> gitter [3]. Slack seems a little closed to dev team rather than open
> to
> >> the
> >>>> public like mail lists, while gitter seems more keen on users rather
> >> than
> >>>> contributors and if we don't have the energy to maintain the how-to
> >>>> questions in the channels, it may end up with giving users a higher
> >>>> expectation than we could provide.
> >>>> I guess slack could be an option for better instant and informal
> >>>> communication than mail list, although it is also async, of course.
> >> There
> >>>> may also be a concern about not having many people participating in
> the
> >>>> discussion. But I guess that is acceptable for the start, and we do
> >> wish to
> >>>> encourage more developers to participate in.
> >>>>
> >>>> In conclusion, we are still on the way to find a better solution for
> >>>> contributing stuff. And you are always welcomed to give advice on it.
> >>>> And thanks again for asking. :)
> >>>>
> >>>> [1]
> >>>>
> >>
> https://github.com/apache/incubator-echarts/issues?q=is%3Aopen+is%3Aissue+label%3Abug
> >>>> [2] https://slack.com
> >>>> [3] https://gitter.im
> >>>> [4] https://github.com/apache/incubator-echarts/projects/3
> >>>>
> >>>> Zhang Wenli
> >>>> http://zhangwenli.com
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Clement Ho <[email protected]> 于2019年3月1日周五 下午12:27写道:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I recently noticed that the issue template for the ECharts GitHub
> >> project
> >>>>> now requests all new issues to be filled through
> >>>>> https://ecomfe.github.io/echarts-issue-helper
> >>>>>
> >>>>> I'm all for better issue management but I was wondering if there was
> >> some
> >>>>> kind of open discussion about this that I could participate in or
> >> observe?
> >>>>> Is there another mailing list or other form of communication tool
> that
> >> is
> >>>>> being used apart from this dev mailing list?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Clement
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
> >>
> >>
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [email protected]
> For additional commands, e-mail: [email protected]
>
>

Reply via email to