I have submitted the request. On Mon, Nov 20, 2017 at 9:44 AM Dale LaBossiere <dml.apa...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don’t think a formal vote is required. Anyone who might have had an > opinion has had ample opportunity to express it. > So, the informal tally is two +1 (you and me) and no -1. > > So, John, please move forward with creating a repo for the samples. > > Thanks! > — Dale > > > > On Nov 12, 2017, at 8:34 AM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > wrote: > > > > Sooo … what’s the current state? > > > > Do we need a vote on this to document the desire to create a new repo? > > > > Chris > > > > Am 08.11.17, 06:16 schrieb "Christofer Dutz" <christofer.d...@c-ware.de > >: > > > > Hi all, > > > > well there are several reasons, why I think separating the samples > from the framework is a good idea. > > > > 1) It makes the repo a lot bigger and as you said overwhelming > > 2) Usually people want to use Edgent and only a certain percentage > also want to contribute, build-time, complexity-to-setup, > complexity-to-understand etc. could scare people > > 3) Usually Samples are a sort of playground … one that has to be > maintained. Would be unfortunate to have to wait to clean up sample code > and keep us from releasing. > > 4) To be on the safe side, we should have to do the same duplication > to build the samples with java7 or java8 … usually a user just wants to > build it for one. > > > > Right now, the way the samples are included, when doing a full build, > the samples would always be built for java7 as this is the last profile > defined. > > > > But that’s just my opinion. > > > > Chris > > > > > > Am 07.11.17, 19:00 schrieb "Dale LaBossiere" <dml.apa...@gmail.com>: > > > > Let’s see what Chris’ thoughts are. > > > > Another aspect of the separation is that importing the full > Edgent sources into an IDE workspace, just to get the samples, can be a bit > overwhelming (with regards to the number of projects present). We could > tell users to deselect all but the samples tree in say the Eclipse import > wizard. Just seems cleaner / easier for a user if we can avoid that detail. > > > > — Dale > > > >> On Nov 7, 2017, at 12:16 PM, John D. Ament <johndam...@apache.org> > wrote: > >> > >> At the end of the day, for me, its whatever the podling thinks it needs > to > >> be successful. I can only give tips based on what I have seen work. > >> > >> Just don't forget that having separate samples means that they can out > of > >> date pretty quickly. > > > > > > > > > > > >
