key added to ldap, probably will take a while more to pop up here: https://people.apache.org/keys/
On 25 October 2012 16:43, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> wrote: > To be clear, if you upload your key to ldap, I'll vote +1 at this point. > > On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:38 AM, Benson Margulies > <[email protected]> wrote: >> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 10:29 AM, Francis De Brabandere >> <[email protected]> wrote: >>> On 25 October 2012 16:05, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:54 AM, Francis De Brabandere >>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Hmm, I remember posting my key to http://pgp.mit.edu/ in the past but >>>>> the server seems to be down, search is not working here >>>> >>>> I was just able to search that site and not find the key. >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> The KEYS file is located here: >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/empire-db/KEYS >>>>> This is also where the website points the user to >>>>> >>>>> Should I move it somewhere else? >>>> >>>> It should be at the root of the SVN tree, so that people can verify >>>> keys against the file retrieved from there over https. >>> >>> If I look at other projects they also have the KEYS at the roots of >>> their dist folder: >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/camel/apache-camel/ >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/ant/ >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/rave/ >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/empire-db/ >> >> Oh, my head hurts. OK. >> >>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Cheers, >>>>> Francis >>>>> >>>>> On 25 October 2012 15:41, Benson Margulies <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>> Also, your key isn't pushed to a key server, though that's not as >>>>>> important. >>>>>> >>>>>> How did we ever get through incubation without a KEYS file in svn? >>>>>> >>>>>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 9:37 AM, Benson Margulies >>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> There doesn't seem to be a KEYS file in svn. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Could you please create one and put your key in it before I vote? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Thu, Oct 25, 2012 at 4:20 AM, Francis De Brabandere >>>>>>> <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> As the previous rc1 was voted down because of a leftover disclaimer >>>>>>>> file we have prepared a new 2.4.1 release and we are now looking for >>>>>>>> approval of the PMC to publish the release. >>>>>>>> More info on release requirements can be found here: >>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dev/release#approving-a-release >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> These are the major changes from our previous 2.4.0 release: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A lot of updates to the JSF2 module >>>>>>>> Miscellaneous small improvements such as new overloads and >>>>>>>> improved JavaDoc >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Changelog: >>>>>>>> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/empire-db/tags/apache-empire-db-2.4.1-rc2/CHANGELOG.txt?view=co >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Subversion tag: >>>>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/empire-db/tags/apache-empire-db-2.4.1-rc2 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Maven staging repository: >>>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapacheempire-db-165/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Distribution files are located here >>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/ >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Rat report for the tag is available here: >>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~francisdb/empire-db/rat.txt >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Vote open for 72 hours. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> [ ] +1 >>>>>>>> [ ] +0 >>>>>>>> [ ] -1
