sure you did not right click and save the proxy selection page?

On 10 January 2017 at 16:05, Francis De Brabandere <[email protected]>
wrote:

> Hmm,
>
> 2.4.4 dist works for me
>
> gpg --keyserver pgpkeys.mit.edu --recv-key AE64E518
>
> gpg --verify apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.tar.gz.asc
> gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.tar.gz'
> gpg: Signature made Tue Aug 11 12:18:34 2015 CEST using DSA key ID AE64E518
> gpg: Good signature from "Francis De Brabandere <[email protected]>"
> [ultimate]
>
> ➜  md5 apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.tar.gz
> MD5 (apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.tar.gz) = 2a461179e34afe0b2acaf9e42503e3
> 3f
> ➜  cat apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.tar.gz.md5
> 2a461179e34afe0b2acaf9e42503e33f  ./target/apache-empire-db-2.
> 4.4-dist.tar.gz
> ➜  openssl sha1 apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.tar.gz
> SHA1(apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.tar.gz)= fe9fd8d45332a7e4db0f4d444e0941
> d182c31116
> ➜  cat apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.tar.gz.sha
> fe9fd8d45332a7e4db0f4d444e0941d182c31116  ./target/apache-empire-db-2.
> 4.4-dist.tar.gz
>
> both sha and md5 match here for tar.gz
>
> same for zip
>
> ➜  cat apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.zip.sha
> b46a4ea4feed1c2686c2ba2b6b0bf8c89ac21acf  ./target/apache-empire-db-2.
> 4.4-dist.zip
> ➜  openssl sha1 apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.zip
> SHA1(apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.zip)= b46a4ea4feed1c2686c2ba2b6b0bf8
> c89ac21acf
>
>
>
>
> On 10 January 2017 at 15:52, <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> thx, I can verify 2.4.6rc2 now.
>>
>> but 2.4.4 from website is still broken:
>>
>> [jan ~/tmp] gpg --verify apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.zip.asc
>> gpg: Warning: using insecure memory!
>> gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.zip'
>> gpg: Signature made Tue Aug 11 12:18:34 2015 CEST
>> gpg:                using DSA key 593A1304AE64E518
>> gpg: BAD signature from "Francis De Brabandere <[email protected]>"
>> [unknown]
>>
>> md5 & sha are also bad:
>>
>> b735ed3a4f477d8f1a03c6de22c7b361  ./target/apache-empire-db-2.4.
>> 4-dist.zip
>>
>> [jan ~/tmp] md5 apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.zip
>> MD5 (apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.zip) = 2ea5495d519307a7987fd08182c688ed
>>
>> b46a4ea4feed1c2686c2ba2b6b0bf8c89ac21acf  ./target/apache-empire-db-2.4.
>> 4-dist.zip
>>
>> [jan ~/tmp] sha1 apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.zip
>> SHA1 (apache-empire-db-2.4.4-dist.zip) = 96f788b9dc564e607052903eb6e091
>> f041ade075
>>
>> are we sure nobody touched it...?
>>
>> - jan
>>
>> Zitat von Francis De Brabandere <[email protected]>:
>>
>>
>> @Jan, you can import the signature from the mit keyserver
>>> gpg --keyserver pgpkeys.mit.edu --recv-key 0B5DFB51
>>>
>>> @Rainer the KEYS file is still not updated
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/empire-db/KEYS
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>> F
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On 10 January 2017 at 08:39, Jan Glaubitz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello Rainer,
>>>>
>>>> SHA works now (but: maybe we should use at least SHA256?)
>>>>
>>>> I'm still unable to verify the PGP signature.
>>>>
>>>> - jan
>>>>
>>>> Von meinem iPhone gesendet
>>>>
>>>> > Am 10.01.2017 um 08:18 schrieb Rainer Döbele <[email protected]>:
>>>> >
>>>> > Hi Jan,
>>>> >
>>>> > you are absolutely right: instead of the sha hash the file contained
>>>> the
>>>> md5 hash.
>>>> > I have corrected it now.
>>>> > Please check again.
>>>> >
>>>> > Regards
>>>> > Rainer
>>>> >
>>>> >> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>> >> To: [email protected]
>>>> >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.4.6 (rc2)
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Hello Rainer,
>>>> >>
>>>> >> how did you create the sha sum? I cant validate its correct:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> [jan ~/tmp] sha1 apache-empire-db-2.4.6-dist.zip
>>>> >> SHA1 (apache-empire-db-2.4.6-dist.zip) =
>>>> >> 9d0f4e28334561e15458671b7b093b7b3cc5f9cb
>>>> >>
>>>> >> yours look a little bit short...?
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Which key did you use to create the PGP signature? I can't verify
>>>> with
>>>> they
>>>> >> KEYS file from the website:
>>>> >>
>>>> >> [jan ~/tmp] gpg --verify apache-empire-db-2.4.6-dist.zip.asc
>>>> >> gpg: Warning: using insecure memory!
>>>> >> gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-empire-db-2.4.6-dist.zip'
>>>> >> gpg: Signature made Mon Jan  9 11:46:48 2017 CET
>>>> >> gpg:                using RSA key 0279D7D50B5DFB51
>>>> >> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key
>>>> >>
>>>> >> - jan
>>>> >>
>>>> >> Zitat von Rainer Döbele <[email protected]>:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>> Hi all,
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Due to an incorrect distribution file I have cancelled rc1 and
>>>> >>> prepared a second release candidate for version 2.4.6.
>>>> >>> Please do all check and vote again on this release candidate.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> A list of all resolved issues for this release can be found here:
>>>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EMPIREDB-
>>>> >> 250?jql=project%20%3D%2
>>>> >>> 0EMPIREDB%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(empire-db-
>>>> >> 2.4.6%2C%20empire-db-2.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >> 4.5)%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20create
>>>> >> d%20ASC
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Maven staging repository:
>>>> >>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache
>>>> empire-db-
>>>> >>> 1004/
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> The distribution files are located here:
>>>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/empire-db/apache-empi
>>>> re-db-2.4.
>>>> >>> 6-rc2/
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> The Rat report for the tag is available here:
>>>> >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/empire-db/apache-empi
>>>> re-db-2.4.
>>>> >>> 6-rc2/rat.txt
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> Vote open for 72 hours.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>> [ ] +1
>>>> >>> [ ] +0
>>>> >>> [ ] -1
>>>> >>
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>
>>
>>
>

Reply via email to