+1 Thanks Rainer, Jan & Francis
Jan Glaubitz <[email protected]> ezt írta (időpont: 2017. jan. 12., Cs, 10:04): > Not really, its just an address 🤷🏻♂️ and I dont think you wanna use it > for real E-Mails. Just dont lose your private key ;-) > > +1 > > Von meinem iPhone gesendet > > > Am 12.01.2017 um 09:53 schrieb Rainer Döbele <[email protected]>: > > > > I have now updated the KEYS file. > > > > (Unfortunately I have created the key using my business email rather > than my apache.org email - does it matter?) > > > > Regards, > > Rainer > > > >> From: Francis De Brabandere [mailto:[email protected]] > >> To: dev <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.4.6 (rc2) > >> > >> So once the KEYS file is updated this is a +1 from me > >> > >> On 10 January 2017 at 15:41, Francis De Brabandere <[email protected] > > > >> wrote: > >> > >>> @Jan, you can import the signature from the mit keyserver gpg > >>> --keyserver pgpkeys.mit.edu --recv-key 0B5DFB51 > >>> > >>> @Rainer the KEYS file is still not updated > >>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/release/empire-db/KEYS > >>> > >>> Cheers, > >>> F > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>>> On 10 January 2017 at 08:39, Jan Glaubitz <[email protected]> wrote: > >>>> > >>>> Hello Rainer, > >>>> > >>>> SHA works now (but: maybe we should use at least SHA256?) > >>>> > >>>> I'm still unable to verify the PGP signature. > >>>> > >>>> - jan > >>>> > >>>> Von meinem iPhone gesendet > >>>> > >>>>> Am 10.01.2017 um 08:18 schrieb Rainer Döbele <[email protected]>: > >>>>> > >>>>> Hi Jan, > >>>>> > >>>>> you are absolutely right: instead of the sha hash the file > >>>>> contained > >>>> the md5 hash. > >>>>> I have corrected it now. > >>>>> Please check again. > >>>>> > >>>>> Regards > >>>>> Rainer > >>>>> > >>>>>> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] > >>>>>> To: [email protected] > >>>>>> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Apache Empire-db 2.4.6 (rc2) > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Hello Rainer, > >>>>>> > >>>>>> how did you create the sha sum? I cant validate its correct: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [jan ~/tmp] sha1 apache-empire-db-2.4.6-dist.zip > >>>>>> SHA1 (apache-empire-db-2.4.6-dist.zip) = > >>>>>> 9d0f4e28334561e15458671b7b093b7b3cc5f9cb > >>>>>> > >>>>>> yours look a little bit short...? > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Which key did you use to create the PGP signature? I can't verify > >>>>>> with > >>>> they > >>>>>> KEYS file from the website: > >>>>>> > >>>>>> [jan ~/tmp] gpg --verify apache-empire-db-2.4.6-dist.zip.asc > >>>>>> gpg: Warning: using insecure memory! > >>>>>> gpg: assuming signed data in 'apache-empire-db-2.4.6-dist.zip' > >>>>>> gpg: Signature made Mon Jan 9 11:46:48 2017 CET > >>>>>> gpg: using RSA key 0279D7D50B5DFB51 > >>>>>> gpg: Can't check signature: No public key > >>>>>> > >>>>>> - jan > >>>>>> > >>>>>> Zitat von Rainer Döbele <[email protected]>: > >>>>>> > >>>>>>> Hi all, > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Due to an incorrect distribution file I have cancelled rc1 and > >>>>>>> prepared a second release candidate for version 2.4.6. > >>>>>>> Please do all check and vote again on this release candidate. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> A list of all resolved issues for this release can be found here: > >>>>>>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/EMPIREDB- > >>>>>> 250?jql=project%20%3D%2 > >>>>>>> 0EMPIREDB%20AND%20fixVersion%20in%20(empire-db- > >>>>>> 2.4.6%2C%20empire-db-2. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>> > >> 4.5)%20ORDER%20BY%20due%20ASC%2C%20priority%20DESC%2C%20create > >>>>>> d%20ASC > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Maven staging repository: > >>>>>>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapache > >>>> empire-db- > >>>>>>> 1004/ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The distribution files are located here: > >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/empire-db/apache-empire- > >> db > >>>>>>> -2.4 > >>>> . > >>>>>>> 6-rc2/ > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> The Rat report for the tag is available here: > >>>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/empire-db/apache-empire- > >> db > >>>>>>> -2.4 > >>>> . > >>>>>>> 6-rc2/rat.txt > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> Vote open for 72 hours. > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> [ ] +1 > >>>>>>> [ ] +0 > >>>>>>> [ ] -1 > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>> > >
