Niclas Hedhman wrote:
On Tuesday 24 July 2007 00:04, Richard S. Hall wrote:
For the most part, the document is the same as before, but the incubator
references are removed and some points are clarified further. Please
vote on accepting this document:
[x] +1 - Accept community process and roles document.
[ ] 0 - Don't care.
[ ] -1 - Reject community process and roles document.
I would even claim that that page is a "Guidelines" page, and voting is not
truly necessary. These are typical "lazy consensus" stuff. "Hey, I made the
following changes (see commit r656523243342). WDYT?"
I have noticed that a lot of new projects in Apache, use voting more than was
originally intended. The "lazy consensus" concept is slowly fading
away... :o(
I agree that lazy consensus should be used more too; however, this
document actually defines how we operate so I don't think it should be
decided by laziness. :-)
Btw, Good Work & Progress on the website! It will be important in the long run
to make it solid...
Thanks.
-> richard
