+1 regards,
Karl On 7/24/07, Clement Escoffier <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 Clement Richard S. Hall wrote: > Niclas Hedhman wrote: >> On Tuesday 24 July 2007 00:04, Richard S. Hall wrote: >> >>> For the most part, the document is the same as before, but the >>> incubator >>> references are removed and some points are clarified further. Please >>> vote on accepting this document: >>> >>> >> [x] +1 - Accept community process and roles document. >> [ ] 0 - Don't care. >> [ ] -1 - Reject community process and roles document. >> >> I would even claim that that page is a "Guidelines" page, and voting >> is not truly necessary. These are typical "lazy consensus" stuff. >> "Hey, I made the following changes (see commit r656523243342). WDYT?" >> I have noticed that a lot of new projects in Apache, use voting more >> than was originally intended. The "lazy consensus" concept is slowly >> fading away... :o( >> > > I agree that lazy consensus should be used more too; however, this > document actually defines how we operate so I don't think it should be > decided by laziness. :-) > >> Btw, Good Work & Progress on the website! It will be important in the >> long run to make it solid... >> > > Thanks. > > -> richard > -- Ascert - Taking systems to the Edge [EMAIL PROTECTED] +44 (0)20 7488 3470 www.ascert.com
-- Karl Pauls [EMAIL PROTECTED]
