Richard S. Hall wrote:
I think this is not an unreasonable approach...
-> richard
Which approach were you refering to? OSGi Alliance, Our or Mine?
Felix Meschberger wrote:
Hi Stefano,
Comparing our compendium jar to the one downloaded from the OSGi site
shows, that we have some imports while the OSGi one only has a
"DynamicImport-Package: *".
So I consider our compendium jar to be erroneous and we should either
tag all imports with "resolution:=optional" or have no explicit imports
at all. This is probably better than to try to mess around with XML APIs
without a real need.
In fact, javax.servlet.* imports of the compendium jar are also not that
practical in a non-web oriented application ;-)
Regards
Felix
Am Mittwoch, den 13.02.2008, 17:10 +0100 schrieb Stefano Lenzi:
Hi All,
I would like to create a bundle which contains only the javax.xml
APIs as we did for javax.servelet. In fact, at the moment, you can't
install the org.osgi.compendium bundle on a JDK 1.3 because javax.xml
APIs are missing. The creation of a javax.xml bundle which will
mostly used by JDK1.3 people will fill the gap.
As reported on JIRA, I know that under commons we have xml-apis which
exports the javax.xml APIs but it also implements the APIs thus it
ends up to be huge in size for embedded system point of view which
are, probably, the nowadays device running JDK 1.3.
WDYT?
Ciao,
Stefano "Kismet" Lenzi
