Thanx for the link Richard. I used the new property for start level. I still think that an migration path or something as what is changed between the "legacy" how you named and 1.4.0 will be a real help for people switching to the new version.
On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Alin Dreghiciu wrote: >> >> If that's the case, as Stuart mention, can someone provide a list of >> what properties are no longer supported or deprecated and which are >> the new ones? >> >> > > http://felix.apache.org/site/apache-felix-usage-documentation.html > > -> richard > >> Thanx, >> >> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> 2008/11/6 Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Yep, Clement is correct. >>>> >>>> We have introduced a new property in 1.3.0 development version (1.4.0 >>>> should be officially released soon). These new changes align with a >>>> standard >>>> framework API under consideration by the OSGi Alliance. >>>> >>>> Felix will now set a reasonable default value for >>>> org.osgi.framework.system.packages, but you can override the default by >>>> setting this property yourself. If you just want to append to the >>>> default >>>> value, then use org.osgi.framework.system.packages.extra, like Clement >>>> described. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> quick question: has "felix.startlevel.framework" been deprecated in >>> favour >>> of "org.osgi.framework.startlevel" ? >>> if so then should the old property name still be checked as a last >>> resort? >>> I think it's currently ignored in trunk, >>> but "felix.startlevel.bundle" still seems to be accepted... >>> >>> -> richard >>> >>>> >>>> Clement Escoffier wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> Hi, >>>>> >>>>> You can set the "org.osgi.framework.system.packages.extra=" property in >>>>> the >>>>> conf.properties file. >>>>> For example: >>>>> org.osgi.framework.system.packages.extra=foo;version=1.0.0, \ >>>>> bar;version=1.1.0 >>>>> >>>>> Those packages will be appended to the default list contained in Felix. >>>>> So, if you launch the 'packages 0' command in the Felix shell, you will >>>>> see >>>>> the default exported packages, and the two appended packages: >>>>> ->packages 0 >>>>> ... >>>>> System Bundle (0): org.xml.sax.ext; version=1.5.0 >>>>> System Bundle (0): org.xml.sax.helpers; version=1.5.0 >>>>> System Bundle (0): foo; version=1.0.0 >>>>> System Bundle (0): bar; version=1.1.0 >>>>> >>>>> Regards, >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Clement >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>> From: Atle Prange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: mercredi 5 >>>>> novembre 2008 08:20 >>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>> Subject: Felix 1.3.0 Changes >>>>> >>>>> Hei, >>>>> >>>>> i have just built the 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT and i see there are some changes >>>>> from >>>>> the 1.2.1 (obviously). >>>>> >>>>> I have a question about how i declare the packages the framework should >>>>> export. Are they defined as before, or is there a new key in the >>>>> config.proprties? >>>>> >>>>> Thank you >>>>> - atle prange >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>> >>> -- >>> Cheers, Stuart >>> >>> >> >> >> >> > -- Alin Dreghiciu http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open Participation Software. http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development. http://malaysia.jayway.net - New Energy for Projects - Great People working on Great Projects at Great Places
