I guess it would be perfect. Thanx. On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 5:03 PM, Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Alin, > > I could add a section to the usage document describing how the old > properties have become the new properties, would that work? > > -> richard > > Alin Dreghiciu wrote: >> >> Thanx for the link Richard. I used the new property for start level. >> I still think that an migration path or something as what is changed >> between the "legacy" how you named and 1.4.0 will be a real help for >> people switching to the new version. >> >> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >>> >>> Alin Dreghiciu wrote: >>> >>>> >>>> If that's the case, as Stuart mention, can someone provide a list of >>>> what properties are no longer supported or deprecated and which are >>>> the new ones? >>>> >>>> >>>> >>> >>> http://felix.apache.org/site/apache-felix-usage-documentation.html >>> >>> -> richard >>> >>> >>>> >>>> Thanx, >>>> >>>> On Wed, Nov 5, 2008 at 6:04 PM, Stuart McCulloch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> 2008/11/6 Richard S. Hall <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Yep, Clement is correct. >>>>>> >>>>>> We have introduced a new property in 1.3.0 development version (1.4.0 >>>>>> should be officially released soon). These new changes align with a >>>>>> standard >>>>>> framework API under consideration by the OSGi Alliance. >>>>>> >>>>>> Felix will now set a reasonable default value for >>>>>> org.osgi.framework.system.packages, but you can override the default >>>>>> by >>>>>> setting this property yourself. If you just want to append to the >>>>>> default >>>>>> value, then use org.osgi.framework.system.packages.extra, like Clement >>>>>> described. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> quick question: has "felix.startlevel.framework" been deprecated in >>>>> favour >>>>> of "org.osgi.framework.startlevel" ? >>>>> if so then should the old property name still be checked as a last >>>>> resort? >>>>> I think it's currently ignored in trunk, >>>>> but "felix.startlevel.bundle" still seems to be accepted... >>>>> >>>>> -> richard >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Clement Escoffier wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hi, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> You can set the "org.osgi.framework.system.packages.extra=" property >>>>>>> in >>>>>>> the >>>>>>> conf.properties file. >>>>>>> For example: >>>>>>> org.osgi.framework.system.packages.extra=foo;version=1.0.0, \ >>>>>>> bar;version=1.1.0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Those packages will be appended to the default list contained in >>>>>>> Felix. >>>>>>> So, if you launch the 'packages 0' command in the Felix shell, you >>>>>>> will >>>>>>> see >>>>>>> the default exported packages, and the two appended packages: >>>>>>> ->packages 0 >>>>>>> ... >>>>>>> System Bundle (0): org.xml.sax.ext; version=1.5.0 >>>>>>> System Bundle (0): org.xml.sax.helpers; version=1.5.0 >>>>>>> System Bundle (0): foo; version=1.0.0 >>>>>>> System Bundle (0): bar; version=1.1.0 >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Regards, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Clement >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> -----Original Message----- >>>>>>> From: Atle Prange [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: mercredi >>>>>>> 5 >>>>>>> novembre 2008 08:20 >>>>>>> To: [email protected] >>>>>>> Subject: Felix 1.3.0 Changes >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Hei, >>>>>>> >>>>>>> i have just built the 1.3.0-SNAPSHOT and i see there are some changes >>>>>>> from >>>>>>> the 1.2.1 (obviously). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> I have a question about how i declare the packages the framework >>>>>>> should >>>>>>> export. Are they defined as before, or is there a new key in the >>>>>>> config.proprties? >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thank you >>>>>>> - atle prange >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Cheers, Stuart >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >> >> >> >> >
-- Alin Dreghiciu http://www.ops4j.org - New Energy for OSS Communities - Open Participation Software. http://www.qi4j.org - New Energy for Java - Domain Driven Development. http://malaysia.jayway.net - New Energy for Projects - Great People working on Great Projects at Great Places
