Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: > On Mon, May 18, 2009 at 10:00 AM, Carsten Ziegeler <cziege...@apache.org> > wrote: >> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: >>> On Sun, May 17, 2009 at 9:32 PM, peter royal <pro...@apache.org> wrote: >>>> On May 17, 2009, at 3:05 PM, Robert Burrell Donkin wrote: >>>>> this is a little bit of a crazy idea but if there enough interested >>>>> committers then maybe we could go over to excalibur and ask for karma >>>>> to release new versions of pretty much everything with OSGi bindings. >>>>> i've taken a look and i'd be willing to do the leg work (it doesn't >>>>> look too bad) if enough committers were willing to review the >>>>> releases. >>>>> >>>>> opinions? >>>> that would be a great way to breathe some new life into that code! >>> i get a little frustrated explaining to users that a lot of those >>> services are tricky to get right, and i'd much rather use a mature >>> component with little ongoing development that has been well tested in >>> production than hack yet-another-thread-pool frmo stratch. >>> >> Oh, by the way :) I'Ve ported the thread pool to OSGi already...it's in >> Sling commons. > > cool :-) > > any plans to bring it into the commons here...? > We discussed this briefly at the last ApacheCon Europe, but only briefly. In general it makes sense to move this stuff over to Felix. I guess we might address this, once Sling is top-level, so after we left the incubation.
Carsten -- Carsten Ziegeler cziege...@apache.org
