Okidoki, I'll leave that one for now. Cheers,
David 2009/10/15 Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com> > Right, I think I've missed that one while refactoring the JMX layer > for the features service. > Unless there is a real need for that now, I would defer to 1.2.0 and > refactor it in a more coarse grained service, the same way we did for > the FeaturesServiceMBean, so that we'd have a getInstances() method > that would return a TabularData containing all the informations > available for a give instance (name, port and state for now). We > could leave the other methods unchanged. > > On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 18:09, David Bosschaert > <david.bosscha...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > While looking at FELIX-1655, I noticed that there is actually an > > AdminServiceMBean in the code, but it doesn't seem to be registered with > the > > MBean Server. Is this done deliberately or is this an oversight or am I > > missing it? > > > > I think having this controllable through JMX would be useful - I'd be > happy > > to try an enable this functionality... > > > > Cheers, > > > > David > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com >
