I've just provided a patch for this on FELIX-1766. David
2009/10/16 David Bosschaert <david.bosscha...@gmail.com> > I've created FELIX-1766 for this. > > > 2009/10/16 Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com> > >> Sounds good! >> >> On Friday, October 16, 2009, David Bosschaert >> <david.bosscha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > The offer still stands :) I can try to get it refactored next week. If I >> > don't have it ready in time, we can always put it in a later release... >> > >> > David >> > >> > 2009/10/16 Eoghan Glynn <eogl...@gmail.com> >> > >> >> It would be quite useful to have the AdminServiceMBean.getInstances() >> >> operation exposed, as it would allow for remote probing that a >> particular >> >> instance has been successfully started. I'm thinking of a scenario >> where >> >> this probe is done programmatically via JMX/RMI as opposed to manually >> >> using >> >> some tooling like jconsole. We have an application where we create >> >> instances >> >> remotely in order to run some tests, hence the need to probe for the >> >> readiness of each new instance. >> >> >> >> Cheers, >> >> Eoghan >> >> >> >> 2009/10/16 Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com> >> >> >> >> > However, if we have time to refactor it very soon, i would certainly >> >> > have no problem to include it in 1.0.2. >> >> > What I meant is that I'd rather avoid exposing an mbean which is >> bound >> >> > to be refactored in the near future. >> >> > >> >> > On Fri, Oct 16, 2009 at 10:30, David Bosschaert >> >> > <david.bosscha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > > Okidoki, I'll leave that one for now. >> >> > > >> >> > > Cheers, >> >> > > >> >> > > David >> >> > > >> >> > > 2009/10/15 Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com> >> >> > > >> >> > >> Right, I think I've missed that one while refactoring the JMX >> layer >> >> > >> for the features service. >> >> > >> Unless there is a real need for that now, I would defer to 1.2.0 >> and >> >> > >> refactor it in a more coarse grained service, the same way we did >> for >> >> > >> the FeaturesServiceMBean, so that we'd have a getInstances() >> method >> >> > >> that would return a TabularData containing all the informations >> >> > >> available for a give instance (name, port and state for now). We >> >> > >> could leave the other methods unchanged. >> >> > >> >> >> > >> On Thu, Oct 15, 2009 at 18:09, David Bosschaert >> >> > >> <david.bosscha...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> > >> > Hi all, >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > While looking at FELIX-1655, I noticed that there is actually an >> >> > >> > AdminServiceMBean in the code, but it doesn't seem to be >> registered >> >> > with >> >> > >> the >> >> > >> > MBean Server. Is this done deliberately or is this an oversight >> or >> >> am >> >> > I >> >> > >> > missing it? >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > I think having this controllable through JMX would be useful - >> I'd >> >> be >> >> > >> happy >> >> > >> > to try an enable this functionality... >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > Cheers, >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> > David >> >> > >> > >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> >> > >> -- >> >> > >> Cheers, >> >> > >> Guillaume Nodet >> >> > >> ------------------------ >> >> > >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> >> > >> ------------------------ >> >> > >> Open Source SOA >> >> > >> http://fusesource.com >> >> > >> >> >> > > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > >> >> > -- >> >> > Cheers, >> >> > Guillaume Nodet >> >> > ------------------------ >> >> > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> >> > ------------------------ >> >> > Open Source SOA >> >> > http://fusesource.com >> >> > >> >> >> > >> >> -- >> Cheers, >> Guillaume Nodet >> ------------------------ >> Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ >> ------------------------ >> Open Source SOA >> http://fusesource.com >> > >
