[ 
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1910?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12835677#action_12835677
 ] 

Felix Meschberger commented on FELIX-1910:
------------------------------------------

Patch 16.license_plugin.patch [1] of FELIX-1988 includes a first step into this 
direction, but there is a problem IMHO: The patch uses three request parameters 
to select the license file to return:

   bid -- bundle ID
   url -- the license file to return
   jar -- (optional) the path to an embedded library providing the license file

IMHO, this should all be encoded in the request URL, something like

    http://..../licenses/<bundleId>/<path_to_jar>.jar/<path_to_file>

where the "<path_to_jar>.jar" part would be optional (and the .jar suffix could 
be used as a match-marker

In addition, instead of sending back INTERNAL_SERVER_ERROR and FORBIDDEN, I 
would just send back 404/NOT FOUND if the path is invalid or the file cannot be 
resolved or an illegal file is requested.

> Normal URLs instead of Javascript links in Licenses screen
> ----------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: FELIX-1910
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FELIX-1910
>             Project: Felix
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: Web Console
>    Affects Versions: webconsole-1.2.10
>            Reporter: Jukka Zitting
>            Assignee: Felix Meschberger
>
> The Licenses screen in the Web Management Console uses links like 
> javascript:displayBundle("123"); and javascript:displayFile("123", "Bundle 
> Resources", "1"); which make it impossible to directly link to specific 
> license information.
> It would be better if all the exposed information had a normal http URL like 
> in the Bundles screen. In fact, how about if license information was included 
> in the bundle information page at http://.../bundles/123?
> PS. Note that I'm looking at version 1.2.10 of the console, but since I 
> didn't find relevant issues against more recent releases I believe this issue 
> is still valid for the latest trunk.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.

Reply via email to