On 1/6/11 10:09, Peakall,Dale wrote:
The Log Service is not 4.2 compliant. It doesn't send log events to event admin service (if available) etc. I can update it to do this, but I've never seen anyone complain about the missing functionality (added in 4.1 IIRC). Everyone I know uses PAX-Log for production systems as the in-memory solution is not appropriate.
A patch would be great. :-) -> richard
-----Original Message----- From: Ikuo Yamasaki [mailto:yamasaki.i...@lab.ntt.co.jp] Sent: 15 December 2010 03:45 To: dev@felix.apache.org Subject: Re: Q on R4.2 Spec Compliance Felix, and David, Thank you for your reply. I understand about the framework stuff. If anyone can provide information or a web page provides those info, it would be very helpful, especially for newcomers to adopt Felix impl. Best regards, On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:42:23 +0100 Felix Meschberger<fmesc...@gmail.com> wrote: Felix> These I don't know the exact compliance state: Felix> -- Http Service (might be reasonably complete) Felix> -- Deployment Admin Felix> -- Log Service Felix> -- Event Admin (IIRC passes the CT) Felix> -- UPNP Felix> -- Command Shell Felix> -- Wire Admin Felix> -- Preferences Services On Tue, 14 Dec 2010 14:05:53 +0000 David Bosschaert<david.bosscha...@gmail.com> wrote: David> On 14 December 2010 13:42, Felix Meschberger<fmesc...@gmail.com> wrote: David> > Hi Ikuo, David> > David> > Am Dienstag, den 14.12.2010, 16:39 +0900 schrieb Ikuo Yamasaki: David> > David> >> I wonder whether Service Hools Specs in Core Spec R4.2 is supported by David> >> Felix framework. David> > David> > Yes, Service Hooks are supported. At least, the code is there and I David> > would assume that the 4.2 CT would test these. David> David> Yes, I implemented these a good while back. At the time all the CT David> tests were passing when I ran them. David> David> Cheers, David> David> David David> David> ======= Ikuo YAMASAKI
