On 5 February 2011 12:21, Guillaume Nodet <gno...@gmail.com> wrote: > As long has the release has not been approved, the tag does not match > an official release, so it can be freely deleted. >
yep, that's what I meant - another point to consider is users might see 1.0.5 and think it's stable (as it's not 1.0.0) whereas in fact there could have been 5 staged versions just to sort out license / dependency issues and no actual code changes Once the release is voted, I think everyone agree the tag becomes immutable. > > FWIW, Git is much better as a tag really correspond to a moment in the > history, not a branch (which actually makes more sense if you think > about it). agreed, git is better in this regard - but it can be hard to understand at times :) > On Sat, Feb 5, 2011 at 11:04, Felix Meschberger <fmesc...@adobe.com> > wrote: > > Hi, > > > > Am Samstag, den 05.02.2011, 09:52 +0000 schrieb Sahoo: > >> On Friday 04 February 2011 04:48 PM, Stuart McCulloch wrote: > >> > it is easy to retag releases in svn > >> > > >> > > >> What exactly do you mean by "retag releases in svn?" Rename an existing > >> tag or using the same tag name to tag a different snapshot of the source > >> code base? Neither should be done in my IMHO. > > > > Agreed, both is far too easy ... > > > > Regards > > Felix > > > > > > > > -- > Cheers, > Guillaume Nodet > ------------------------ > Blog: http://gnodet.blogspot.com/ > ------------------------ > Open Source SOA > http://fusesource.com > -- Cheers, Stuart
