New version number for any reason makes a lot of sense. A bsn + version must be
as unique as a SHA-1 hashcode of the bundle.
Kind regards,
Peter Kriens
On 4 feb 2011, at 09:39, Carsten Ziegeler wrote:
> Guillaume Nodet wrote
>> On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 02:52, Richard S. Hall <he...@ungoverned.org> wrote:
>>>
>>> If enough people respond maybe we can reach some sort of consensus...or else
>>> we could call a vote on it.
>>
>> Can other felix members speak here ?
>>
> I guess we don't find consensus by just discussing :) Some of us prefer
> it this way, others the other way. I prefer increasing the version
> number for each retry, it requires no additional work (except changing
> the version in jira) and makes it easier to track if people are using
> failed releases. Sure, comparing the hash of the binary artifact would
> solve this as well, but just looking at the version number is soo easy :)
>
> If - as a project - we agree to use the same version number for retries
> I'm ok with as well.
>
> But I agree we should do this consistently and just write it down
> somewhere. So let's call a vote and the majority wins :)
>
> Carsten
> --
> Carsten Ziegeler
> cziege...@apache.org
