+1 (non binding) - very good idea! regards Grzegorz Grzybek
pon., 4 lis 2019 o 17:18 David Jencks <david.a.jen...@gmail.com> napisał(a): > I’m not exactly active currently, but +1 > > David Jencks > > > On Nov 2, 2019, at 5:41 AM, Christian Schneider <ch...@die-schneider.net> > wrote: > > > > I propose we first move the whole repo and then extract projects if > people > > like this. > > It is much easier to do the extraction based on a git project. > > > > Christian > > > > Am Sa., 2. Nov. 2019 um 13:21 Uhr schrieb Jean-Baptiste Onofré < > > j...@nanthrax.net>: > > > >> +1 > >> > >> The question is: do we keep an unique repository for all felix projects > >> or we create one git repo per project. > >> > >> I would prefer to have one dedicated git repo per project > >> (felix-framework, felix-configadmin, etc). > >> > >> Regards > >> JB > >> > >> On 02/11/2019 10:06, Christian Schneider wrote: > >>> In the past we discussed a few times about moving felix to git. > >>> > >>> A while ago we did this step for Aries and it was simpler than > >> anticipated. > >>> The problem in Aries were the remaining small bundles and subprojects > >> that > >>> were released by bundle. The larger sub projects were already moved out > >> to > >>> separate git repos a while ago. > >>> > >>> So the situation was very similar to felix. In the end we opted for the > >>> simple solution of just migrating the full repo to git with the help of > >> the > >>> infra team. > >>> This works quite fine since then. So I propose we do the same for > felix. > >>> > >>> WDYT? > >>> > >>> Christian > >>> > >> > >> -- > >> Jean-Baptiste Onofré > >> jbono...@apache.org > >> http://blog.nanthrax.net > >> Talend - http://www.talend.com > >> > > > > > > -- > > -- > > Christian Schneider > > http://www.liquid-reality.de > > > > Computer Scientist > > http://www.adobe.com > >
