Michael, thanks for bringing this up. It's something that James had
expressed a need for and something Mifos should and will explore more
closely.

Here's what James articulated as the need:


   1. Someone comes to fineract or mifos list serve and wants /needs a
   specific feature.
   2. They are told to input the feature into an online form (and maybe
   also into the issue tracker)
   3. A developer who is a member goes to the platform and puts in a bid in
   4. The next developer who comes may undercut that price
   5. Reverse auction approach

I will look more closely at Issuehunt and have an intern that's working on
community development, Rachit Gupta, one of our GCI winners, explore some
options.

We could potentially use some of the Github Sponsors features - Mifos is
now a part of the program, having moved off the wait list.
https://github.blog/2019-05-23-announcing-github-sponsors-a-new-way-to-contribute-to-open-source/

On Discourse, we have also create a marketplace category for jobs and
service requests which covers some of this but doesn't have the proper
action mechanisms for this bidding/reverse auction.

Ed


On Sun, May 10, 2020, 13:09 Michael Vorburger <m...@vorburger.ch> wrote:

> On Sat, May 9, 2020 at 7:35 PM Michael Vorburger <m...@vorburger.ch>
> wrote:
>
>> Airsay,
>>
>> If I were you, what I would do first to be able to contribute to driving
>> your problem to an eventual resolution, is see if you can figure out if
>> this is a problem in the "back-end" (so a bug in
>> https://github.com/apache/fineract) or a display issue in the UI (so a
>> bug in https://github.com/openMF/community-app). Once that's clear, I
>> would try to create an easy way to reproduce this issue. Then create a bug
>> in the respective project's issue tracker. Then you can see if there any
>> volunteers willing to contribute a fix. Or perhaps one of the partners
>> would want to step up and contribute a fix working for you.
>>
>> BTW Wouldn't it be cool if we used some sort of "tech support auction
>> open marketplace" kind of site? What if Airsay, instead of posting his
>> problem only here to our mailing lists, would create a bug in the
>> appropriate issue tracker, and then be able to put a "bounty" on it -
>> expressing "fixing this would be worth $N to me" (as in "currently", it
>> would have to be possible to adjust it, in reaction to feedback..), to
>> which interested parties and individuals (possibly even several!) could
>> "bid" to mean "Heck yeah, I'd willing to contribute an upstream fix for
>> this for $M!" (or maybe "not really sure what the problems is exactly and
>> how to fix it, but.. for $X I would be willing to make some time to have a
>> closer look for you, and then make you a quote"), out of which Airsay could
>> pick one of the offers. The platform would be some sort of neutral middle
>> man, and would have some sort of fancy game-ified reputation system... ;-)
>> I've never seriously searched for anything like this, but I wouldn't be
>> surprised if someone somewhere already thought of building a site like
>> that... has anyone ever come across something like this? It's just a wild
>> thought.
>>
>
> FYI https://issuehunt.io seems to be something a bit like what I had
> outlined here ^^^ .. I don't know anything more about it, but thought it
> would be worth throwing in here - just in case someone else would like to
> have a closer look at it, and see if this could be something of interest
> for this community. Maybe not suitable - dunno.
>
>
>> Best,
>> M.
>>
>>
>> On Sat, 9 May 2020, 13:22 Airsay Longcon, <airsaylong...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Same under issue in Chrome, Edge, Chromium
>>>
>>> Sent from my iPhone
>>>
>>> On 9 May 2020, at 10:04, Samuel Joseph <sam...@fiter.io> wrote:
>>>
>>> 
>>> Try another browser
>>>
>>> Chrome
>>> Opera, etc
>>>
>>> Safari or FireFox usually have that issue.
>>>
>>> Cheers.
>>>
>>> On Sat, 9 May 2020 at 10:02, airsay longcon <airsaylong...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I am running fineract (develop) on the following infrastructure
>>>> Server: Windows 10
>>>> Tomcat: Tomcat 9.0.34
>>>> MySQL: MySQL 5.5.62
>>>> JDK: OpenJDK 11.0.7
>>>> Fineract: Fineract (develop)
>>>>
>>>> So I have been testing Fineract over the past four months with good
>>>> success until last weekend.
>>>> I have four products, two each under Recurring Deposit and Fixed
>>>> Deposit. My preference would be Recurring Deposit but I can live with Fixed
>>>> Deposit.
>>>> After Properly Setting up products, I created a Client, created a
>>>> back-dated recurring deposit account then calculated and posted interest.
>>>> Prior to now interest posted (correct dates and amounts). However on
>>>> Saturday May 01 (while still running on Tomcat 7 with JDK8) I noticed that
>>>> Transaction Dates for Deposit and Interest displays null
>>>>
>>>> <image.png>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Product is correctly setup as below
>>>> <image.png>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Notice in the screenshot above that Interest Rate Chart has a value
>>>> for "Valid From Date". When I try to create an account however, I notice
>>>> that it displays null as in the screenshot below
>>>> <image.png>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The same thing holds for Fixed Deposit. Anyone faced this before? How
>>>> can i resolve?
>>>>
>>>> Not that Under Transactions when I drill down I get a valid date entry
>>>> as below
>>>> <image.png>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Compare above screenshot for Transaction ID 2 with Transaction entry
>>>> for same Transaction ID 2
>>>> <image.png>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Any help/advice will be appreciated.
>>>>
>>>> Warm Regards
>>>> Airsay
>>>>
>>> --
>>> [image: Logo] <https://www.fiter.io>
>>> *Samuel C.S Joseph*
>>> * Business/Projects.*
>>> *e:* sam...@fiter.io
>>> *w:* fiter.io <http://www.fiter.io>
>>> *m:* +2348107176019
>>> [image: twitter icon] <https://twitter.com/Fiter_io> [image: youtube
>>> icon] <https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCfWztdFtHI3PwaSLAEcwTNQ> [image:
>>> linkedin icon] <https://www.linkedin.com/company/fiter-io>
>>>
>>>

Reply via email to