Hi David, Sounds interesting and a good feature to be unlocked, validation could be added either because of all the scenarios not tested yet, or there could be specific scenarios not handled at that time.
We will have to test as much as scenarios as possible to check if there are any side effects Following are some important scenarios that could be tested 1. Rescheduling of loans and repay/undo repay scenarios. 2. Interest accruals behaviors on daily interest calculation configuration 3.Tranche loans scenarios 4.Penalty charge scenarios If things are still good, we could push the changes back to the upstream codebase, so that all the people of the community could be benifited from the feature. Regards, Bharath Lead Implementation Analyst | Mifos Initiative Skype: live:cbharath4| Mobile: +91.7019635592 http://mifos.org <http://facebook.com/mifos> <http://www.twitter.com/mifos> On Sun, Jan 3, 2021 at 9:34 PM David Yahalomi <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello all, > > In my current work with Fineract, I've noticed that there is a constraint > in Fineract that prohibits the submission of past periods. > > Does anyone know of a reason for that? > From my testing, after disabling this validation check, it seems that the > rest of the code handles that scenario quite well. Any loans with interest > re-calculation will be updated as it should. > > I'd love to hear your thoughts. > > Best, > > David Yahalomi > Co-Founder > > Rothschild Blvd 3, Tel Aviv-Yafo, Israel > mobile: + 972 52 817 9787 > email: [email protected] > <https://articode.co> > ᐧ >
