*Kevin, thanks for emailing me. I would like to state "we" here always mean community when I write these emails. *
Ankit, your actions and / or the firm you represent show a consistent and lengthy pattern where you do not seem to understand how The Apache Software Foundation works. *Wherever, you see mis understandings of how ASF works, please highlight, back with a qualified data, report, or citable information.* No, We do not make blanket rules for one off problems. *Very good. At least we are on the same page that there is a problem here. Would you like to address the problem and investigate more if similar problems exist, in order to create blanket reforms for the overall process.* We are a meritocracy and build consensus with those who have earned merit. *True we are!* Your and your colleagues and actions are clearly not those of an individual but an organization with differing goals and objectives from this foundation which you continue to post about on our forums. *Clearly, Muellners Foundation & ASF are two independent entities with their goals and objectives. I can only assure you that I am posting here as what I am made aware as a human being with no inclination towards either of these Foundations, though respecting the ASF guidelines for these communications.* I am formally stating my objection to your posts and actions. I am formally recommending you and your organization for moderation. *I welcome moderation. Please highlight the data behind your objection on each of my posts or actions. * On Thu, Oct 14, 2021 at 2:32 PM Kevin A. McGrail <kmcgr...@apache.org> wrote: > Ankit, your actions and / or the firm you represent show a consistent and > lengthy pattern where you do not seem to understand how The Apache Software > Foundation works. > > No, We do not make blanket rules for one off problems. > > We are a meritocracy and build consensus with those who have earned merit. > > Your and your colleagues and actions are clearly not those of an > individual but an organization with differing goals and objectives from > this foundation which you continue to post about on our forums. > > I am formally stating my objection to your posts and actions. I am > formally recommending you and your organization for moderation. > > Regards, KAM > > On Thu, Oct 14, 2021, 03:41 Muellners ApS <an...@muellners.org> wrote: > >> Hey James, >> Thanks for clarifying norms here: >> >> A. 1 & 2 is quite important. >> Can I ask you or PMC (as you are the representative of PMC)... >> > >> On Thu, 14 Oct 2021 at 06.24, James Dailey <jamespdai...@gmail.com> >> wrote: >> >>> All - >>> >>> Apache Fineract operates under the rules established by the Apache >>> Software Foundation. >>> https://www.apache.org/theapacheway/index.html >>> https://community.apache.org/projectIndependence >>> https://www.apache.org/foundation/governance/ >>> see our stuff: >>> >>> https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=103094318 >>> >>> 1. As a community of people, we are not here as our company or >>> institution, we are independent persons (individuals). >>> >>> Individuals familiar with or employed by commercial Fineract based >>> Solution Providers, are very welcome to discuss that solution here, >>> especially IF it includes ways in which ideas, requirements, and code >>> can be implemented and contributed back to the community. Apache is >>> non-commercial. >>> >>> Similarly, solutions that connect to Fineract are welcome to help >>> document and improve APIs, test scripts, and the like, to enable good >>> system boundaries. >>> >>> 2. We abide by norms of good behavior and assume good intent. Positive >>> discussion usually starts with identifying the contribution you - as >>> an individual - want to make. >>> >>> It helps immensely to follow norms of a single topic in a threaded >>> email conversation. I.e.Please do not respond to an email w a >>> different topic. >>> >>> 3. We strive to have all our discussions on this public listserv. >>> This may strike some as 'old fashioned' but it is there for good >>> reasons. If you use outside tools (chats, gitter, slack, etc), those >>> conversations should be brought back to list, or "they didn't happen". >>> It's ok to share via tickets as well, but you get more mileage having >>> a discussion. >>> >>> 4. The dev list is public and we allow all in. >>> Over time, positive contributions by participants on list, in content >>> for wiki, in tickets, and in code, earn recognition and merit >>> consideration for additional responsibilities to and on behalf of the >>> project. >>> >>> James Dailey >>> On behalf of the Fineract PMC >>> >> >> -- Ankit Managing Partner Muellners ApS, Denmark Impressum- Muellners® Inc; Copenhagen, Denmark CVR: 41548304; New Delhi, India CIN: U72900DL2019PTC344870; Foundation EU CVR:41008407 This mail is governed by Muellners® IT policy. The information contained in this e-mail and any accompanying documents may contain information that is confidential or otherwise protected from disclosure. If you are not the intended recipient of this message, or if this message has been addressed to you in error, please immediately alert the sender by reply e-mail and then delete this message, including any attachments. Any dissemination, distribution or other use of the contents of this message by anyone other than the intended recipient is strictly prohibited. All messages sent to and from this e-mail address may be monitored as permitted by applicable law and regulations to ensure compliance with our internal policies and to protect our business. E-mails are not secure and cannot be guaranteed to be error free as they can be intercepted, amended, lost or destroyed, or contain viruses. You are deemed to have accepted these risks if you communicate with us by e-mail.
