... other question: does it do anything? I'll have another look at it today, but it seems non-functional.
It's going to be hard to reach in general a consensus if people are not participating... same argument could be made for introducing Liquibase; I'm sure that others invested time in Flyway, but we still replaced it. Just my 2 cents. On Wed, May 18, 2022 at 9:43 AM Awasum Yannick <[email protected]> wrote: > Hello Aleks and Arnold, > > I won't remove that feature given we don't know who may or may not be > using it. > > There are people using Fineract who are not even on this dev list or > participating in conversations. > > I would be careful with what I remove even if it looks unusable to me. > > On Wed, May 18, 2022, 02:11 Aleksandar Vidakovic < > [email protected]> wrote: > >> I would say: +1 >> >> On Tue, May 17, 2022 at 10:01 PM Arnold Galovics <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> Hi guys, >>> >>> I'm exploring the current event handling frameworks available in >>> Fineract - Hooks, Business events and Notification events - and I was >>> wondering if anybody is using the so called "topic subscriptions" in >>> Fineract within the Notification events module. >>> >>> As far as I can tell, it's a half-complete implementation but I see that >>> upon creating a new user and assigning it to an office, it automatically >>> subscribes the user to a particular topic but the notion of "subscribing to >>> a topic" doesn't really have any meaning at this point. >>> >>> If nobody is using the feature, I'll just remove it to get rid of some >>> of the weight we've been carrying. >>> >>> Let me know. >>> >>> Best, >>> Arnold >>> >>
