I guess it depends on the story and how complex it is. Most of the stories would be straight forward and a plain English description(with little background and details,Acceptance Criteria) should be sufficient to understand work on. Where as AI generated tends to give all the details that could be not fully necessary as per the ticket(even though it would be really informative)
Regards, Bharath Lead Implementation Analyst | Mifos Initiative PMC Member | Apache Fineract Mobile: +91.7019635592 http://mifos.org <http://facebook.com/mifos> <http://www.twitter.com/mifos> On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 12:53 AM Arnold Galovics <arn...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi Victor, > > Thanks for asking for feedback on this. Personally I don't really like > these because it naturally feels low-quality content. Even though there's > sections and structures, emojis to it, I feel like it's pretty much BS all > the way through. > > If somebody writes in plain English (even without having perfect English), > I'd much better read it than this. > > Although I'm only one person here, so don't take it for granted. :-) > > Best, > Arnold > > On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 5:37 PM VICTOR MANUEL ROMERO RODRIGUEZ < > victor.rom...@fintecheando.mx> wrote: > >> Hello Apache Fineract Community, >> >> I would like to know your opinion about using AI in Jira Tickets >> >> This is an example: >> >> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-2314 >> >> Please let me know your thoughts. >> >> Regards >> >> Victor Romero >> >
