Hey, I agree with the earlier responses. There isn't much value in a text from simply prompted AI. There's no problem using it developing and improving what you would like to explain, but keep it to generate ideas not to expand text.
Cheers, M. On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 7:42 AM Bharath Gowda <bgo...@mifos.org> wrote: > I guess it depends on the story and how complex it is. > Most of the stories would be straight forward and a plain English > description(with little background and details,Acceptance Criteria) should > be sufficient to understand work on. > Where as AI generated tends to give all the details that could be not > fully necessary as per the ticket(even though it would be really > informative) > > > > > Regards, > Bharath > Lead Implementation Analyst | Mifos Initiative > PMC Member | Apache Fineract > Mobile: +91.7019635592 > http://mifos.org <http://facebook.com/mifos> > <http://www.twitter.com/mifos> > > > On Thu, Jul 3, 2025 at 12:53 AM Arnold Galovics <arn...@apache.org> wrote: > >> Hi Victor, >> >> Thanks for asking for feedback on this. Personally I don't really like >> these because it naturally feels low-quality content. Even though there's >> sections and structures, emojis to it, I feel like it's pretty much BS all >> the way through. >> >> If somebody writes in plain English (even without having perfect >> English), I'd much better read it than this. >> >> Although I'm only one person here, so don't take it for granted. :-) >> >> Best, >> Arnold >> >> On Wed, Jul 2, 2025 at 5:37 PM VICTOR MANUEL ROMERO RODRIGUEZ < >> victor.rom...@fintecheando.mx> wrote: >> >>> Hello Apache Fineract Community, >>> >>> I would like to know your opinion about using AI in Jira Tickets >>> >>> This is an example: >>> >>> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/FINERACT-2314 >>> >>> Please let me know your thoughts. >>> >>> Regards >>> >>> Victor Romero >>> >> -- Mihaly
