On Thu, Mar 14, 2013 at 12:59 PM, Jose Barragan < jose.barra...@codeoscopic.com> wrote:
> I would opt for SmartGit as standalone tool, since TortoiseGit implies > intimate and dependent integration with Windows Explorer, which is not very > stable combination. > Sorry, but I disagree. I have had absolutely no problems with the integrated approach. In fact, that is what makes it a better tool, IMHO. Moreover, folks who have used TortoiseSVN will find themselves at home with TortoiseGit. Thanks, Om > -- > Jose Barragan > Software Architect Chief > Codeoscopic Madrid > C/. Infanta Mercedes, 92. > Planta 5. 505. > 28020 Madrid. > Tel.: +34 912 94 80 80 > > On Mar 14, 2013, at 7:31 PM, Christofer Dutz <christofer.d...@c-ware.de> > wrote: > > > TortoiseGIT rocks :-) > > > > > > > > Am 14. März 2013 18:33:57 schrieb Gordon Smith <gosm...@adobe.com>: > >> I'm waiting until everything settles down. > >> > >> On Windows, do people recommend getting Git through Cygwin? Or > nstalling the Git available at git-scm.com? If the latter, should I use > it in Git Bash or in Command Prompt? Which line endings option should I > choose? > >> > >> - Gordon > >> > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] On Behalf Of Om > >> Sent: Wednesday, March 13, 2013 1:05 AM > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org > >> Subject: Re: Finishing the Git migration - Update > >> > >> Just a note that the Falcon still needs to be verified. I guess Gordon > would be the best person for that. > >> > >> Thanks, > >> Om > > > > > >
