Folks,
During the review of [1] you'll probably do, I've got no doubts the
explanation parts I wrote with my English will not be grammatically correct,
I hope anyway, that will be understandable, feel free to make me some
proposals to improve it, that will save headaches for the others.
Thanks,
-Fred
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Good+vs+Bad+Git+usage
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Frédéric THOMAS
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 2:43 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Git/Wiki] please review the proposed workflow and comment
Hi Guys,
Just to say I created a new page on the wiki [1] to demonstrate Good vs Bad
scenarios / Git usage, I'll fill it with more complex scenarios over the
time.
It can be reviewed too :)
Thanks,
-Fred
[1] https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Good+vs+Bad+Git+usage
-----Message d'origine-----
From: Erik de Bruin
Sent: Sunday, March 24, 2013 11:51 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: [Git/Wiki] please review the proposed workflow and comment
+ 1 on starting out simple and keeping the message clear.
When needed, or as a suggested way to work for those who have a better
than "noob" level understanding of git, I think we should keep the
"rebase" workflow in the wiki. Furthermore, we should write up as much
of this discussion in the wiki as we can, for future reference.
EdB
On Sun, Mar 24, 2013 at 10:04 AM, Justin Mclean
<jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
Hi,
Would you mind if I wrote up a proposed alternate that doesn't use rebase
and eliminate fast forwards? Yes, it will mean there is an extra
'useless' commit... which I don't actually always find useless, but I
think it simpler. Then let's just discuss.
+1 to at least considering this.
Justin
--
Ix Multimedia Software
Jan Luykenstraat 27
3521 VB Utrecht
T. 06-51952295
I. www.ixsoftware.nl
