On 9/24/13 2:31 PM, "Maurice Amsellem" <maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote:
>To make sure I understand correctly, I will have the 3 legal documents >(icla, grant, and corporate) signed by an authority in our company (eg. >CFO or V.P. Products) The ICLA is for you. It says that you, personally, understand the rules under which you are participating. You sign it and send it in. The CCLA is for your corporation so Apache knows your company knows you are contributing. Someone with authority at your company must sign it. These two documents are needed to become a committer (you only need the ICLA if you don't work for a corporation). The Software Grant is the contract/license to use the software being donated. This is a separate transaction from the ICLA/CCLA pair. For example, TLF was donated but none of its engineers became committers. BTW, your corporation still owns the software and retains copyright (more or less), but your corporation is granting a license for Apache to do whatever it wants with it. An authority in your company signs that as well, but put yourself in as the contact so you can find out when the document is recorded at Apache, so you can remind me if I miss the notification email from the secretary. And yes, the secretary will accept scanned PDFs via email. Hope that makes sense. And thanks again. -Alex > >And then send the scanned printed docs to secret...@apache.org, through >regular email. > >Is that OK? > >Maurice > >-----Message d'origine----- >De : Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com] >Envoyé : mardi 24 septembre 2013 23:03 >À : dev@flex.apache.org >Objet : RE: Flex Mobile DataGrid donation submission > >Or Alex, did you mean he doesn't need to send it until the Software Grant >is executed ? > >-Fred > >-----Message d'origine----- >De : Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com] Envoyé : mardi 24 >septembre 2013 23:00 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : RE: Flex Mobile >DataGrid donation submission > >Oh, just answered but in private :P > >Remains 2 little things to do and I guess you can send the zip back to >the ticket. > >-Fred > >-----Message d'origine----- >De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com] >Envoyé : mardi 24 septembre 2013 22:44 >À : dev@flex.apache.org >Objet : RE: Flex Mobile DataGrid donation submission > >Fully agree, I will not add the "Systar" headers, until you add the final >Apache headers. >As you say, the code does not have to be public. > >I just sent an update to Fred, with the changes he asked and a bug fix >following the latest refactoring. > >I will let him get back to his work. > >Maurice > >-----Message d'origine----- >De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mardi 24 septembre 2013 >22:27 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Flex Mobile DataGrid donation >submission > >Hi Maurice, > >Thanks for spending time cleaning up the code a bit. I just didn't want >Fred to feel like he had to keep reviewing since he's short on time. > >IMO, you could wait to post the next package of code until you get >headers in place. You don't even have to do that either, the public >doesn't actually have to see the code until the Software Grant is >executed. > >Thanks, >-Alex > >On 9/24/13 1:22 PM, "Maurice Amsellem" <maurice.amsel...@systar.com> >wrote: > >>Since I am almost done with the changes, I will send an update anyway, >>in >>15 min from now. >> >>Maurice >> >>-----Message d'origine----- >>De : Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com] Envoyé : mardi 24 >>septembre 2013 22:20 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : RE: Flex Mobile >>DataGrid donation submission >> >>So, in that case, that's fine too me. >> >>-----Message d'origine----- >>De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mardi 24 septembre >>2013 22:18 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Flex Mobile DataGrid >>donation submission >> >>Fred & Maurice, >> >>Most/all of this can be fixed post-donation. IMO, the only "required" >>part of the code review is to make sure it looks like code and no >>obvious third-party/licensing issues. >> >>-Alex >> >>On 9/24/13 1:06 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: >> >>>One more point, I guess you should replace the NS >>>library://ns.systar.com/fx/mobile and its directory structure with the >>>Spark one, see the experimental lib for more details. >>> >>>The sort on the computed fullname doesn't work but the sort arrow is >>>still shown when clicked, is it expected ? >>> >>>-Fred >>> >>>-----Message d'origine----- >>>De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com] >>>Envoyé : mardi 24 septembre 2013 21:49 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : >>>RE:Flex Mobile DataGrid donation submission >>> >>>Sure, i ll do that >>>________________________________________ >>>De : Frédéric THOMAS [webdoubl...@hotmail.com] Envoyé : mardi 24 >>>septembre >>>2013 21:22 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : RE: Flex Mobile DataGrid >>>donation submission >>> >>>Maurice, I just noticed some extra import statements and duplicated >>>variables, if you used IntelliJ as primary IDE, please run CTRL+ALT+L >>>on the src folder and run a code analysis. >>> >>>Thanks, >>>-Fred >>> >>>-----Message d'origine----- >>>De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com] >>>Envoyé : mardi 24 septembre 2013 20:26 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : >>>RE: Flex Mobile DataGrid donation submission >>> >>>I will be also more than happy to provide any explanation on the code >>>itself, which I realize is hardly documented. >>> >>>Maurice >>> >>>-----Message d'origine----- >>>De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com] >>>Envoyé : mardi 24 septembre 2013 20:23 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : >>>RE: Flex Mobile DataGrid donation submission >>> >>>FYI, I just send an update with some refactoring to Fred. >>> >>>I can send It to anyone else that wants to take the lead on the review. >>> >>>Maurice >>> >>>-----Message d'origine----- >>>De : Frédéric THOMAS [mailto:webdoubl...@hotmail.com] Envoyé : mardi >>>24 septembre 2013 20:21 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : RE: Flex >>>Mobile DataGrid donation submission >>> >>>Alex, it is very not the better time for me, I'll start a new contract >>>in >>>2 >>>days and I'm be very busy in between, many last time administrative >>>things, etc..., I'm sorry for the inconvenience but if someone else >>>could take the lead on that, it would be great. >>> >>>Moreover, I haven't got any devices at the moment to test it, I could >>>had test it only in the emulator but it is not good enough IMO, in >>>more folks with more mobile skills/experiences than me would be a >>>better choice. >>> >>>Thanks, >>>-Fred >>> >>>-----Message d'origine----- >>>De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mardi 24 septembre >>>2013 >>>19:57 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: Flex Mobile DataGrid >>>donation submission >>> >>>Hi Fred, >>> >>>IMO, it doesn't matter if it has bugs. If you just take a quick look >>>at the code and say it seems reasonably organized and smaller than the >>>Spark DG that's good enough for me. Then start some sort of vote >>>unless it is really just a few files. Use [VOTE] or [LAZY] or [POLL] >>>but IMO, we should draw attention to the fact we're doing this. >>> >>>-Alex >>> >>>On 9/24/13 10:43 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: >>> >>>>@Maurice, that's fine, I've got your email with the attachment, so, >>>>anyone would like to test it is free to ask me to forward him. >>>> >>>>@Om, yep, sounds good. >>>> >>>>-Fred >>>> >>>>-----Message d'origine----- >>>>De : omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] De la part de >>>>OmPrakash Muppirala Envoyé : mardi 24 septembre 2013 19:33 À : >>>>dev@flex.apache.org; jef...@dot-com-it.com Objet : Re: Flex Mobile >>>>DataGrid donation submission >>>> >>>>On Tue, Sep 24, 2013 at 10:28 AM, Jeffry Houser >>>><jef...@dot-com-it.com>wrote: >>>> >>>>> On 9/24/2013 1:24 PM, Alex Harui wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> We've been voting on sizeable non-Adobe contributions. Swiz was >>>>>> the last vote. >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Fair enough. Swiz is an entity separate, but complimentary to the >>>>> Flex Framework. It seems like a mobile optimized DataGrid is more >>>>> like a really big patch. >>>>> >>>> >>>>I agree. I really dont think we need to vote on this. If some >>>>committer wants to veto this, they can go ahead and do so. We can >>>>start a discussion about the reasons for the veto at that point. >>>> >>>>A lazy vote should probably suffice in this case. >>>> >>>>Thanks, >>>>Om >>>> >>>> >>>>> >>>>> However, I'm not opposed to voting. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> -- >>>>> Jeffry Houser >>>>> Technical Entrepreneur >>>>> http://www.jeffryhouser.com >>>>> 203-379-0773 >>>>> >>>>> >>> >> >
