Understood.

In this case, I' am changing the test code so that it matches the existing 
baseline, not changing the baseline.
So it should not have any impact.

Maurice 

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Alex Harui [mailto:[email protected]] 
Envoyé : jeudi 10 octobre 2013 02:43
À : [email protected]; Maurice Amsellem
Objet : RE: Build failed in Jenkins: flex-sdk_mustella #460 (fixed)

When you change a test please consider impact on folks who might have pixel 
tuned their app and may notice the difference. I'm not saying don't change, but 
be careful.




Sent via the PANTECH Discover, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone.

Maurice Amsellem <[email protected]> wrote:


No, because the test on line 579 is:
var showBorder:Boolean = !isNaN(borderThickness);

In the desktop skin, I am setting  it that way:
var showBorder:Boolean = !isNaN(borderThickness) || borderThickness > 0 ;

Should I change the test ?

Maurice

-----Message d'origine-----
De : Justin Mclean [mailto:[email protected]] Envoyé : jeudi 10 octobre 
2013 01:23 À : [email protected] Objet : Re: Build failed in Jenkins: 
flex-sdk_mustella #460 (fixed)

Hi,

> So the variable showBorder on line 579 is set to true.
If borderThinkness is 0 shouldn't showBorder be false? Then the callout should 
be in the right position.

Thanks,
Justin

Reply via email to