Not sure what you're asking. There isn't any Adobe code in there. The zip contains binaries so it can't go in the repo. The sh/bat files in the zip are not in the repo because I keep hoping they will go away someday and be replaced by an installer.
-Alex On 10/31/13 6:30 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >Ok... is that proprietary code, or just not in the repo yet? > >EdB > > > >On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:26 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >> By using the FlexJSOverlay.zip on my people.a.o folder. Instructions >>are >> available at >> >>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Using+FlexJS+with+Adobe+ >>Fl >> ash+Builder >> >> -Alex >> >> On 10/31/13 6:20 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >> >>>And how does one 'overlay' an SDK? >>> >>>EdB >>> >>> >>> >>>On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 2:07 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: >>>> I've been testing against DataBindingTest whose sources are up on my >>>> people.a.o folder, so maybe this doesn't build anymore, but the >>>>console >>>> output looks like you are referencing a full Apache Flex SDK instead >>>>of >>>> one that is overlaid, which might cause the compiler to find CSS files >>>>in >>>> a whole bunch of SWCs that we don't currently handle. >>>> >>>> IOW, you can't just add FlexJSUI.swc to an existing SDK, it has to be >>>> "overlaid" which neuters some things in an Apache Flex SDK. >>>> >>>> -Alex >>>> >>>> On 10/31/13 5:29 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >>>> >>>>>Hi, >>>>> >>>>>I'm busy building support for the "is" and "as" operators into FlexJS. >>>>>Now, first I thought I'd try to compile the FlexJSTest_again example. >>>>>To my suprise, I get an error: >>>>> >>>>>CSS codegen problem. Reason: 'Unable to find compilation unit for >>>>>Embed(source="Assets.swf",symbol="mx.skins.cursor.BusyCursor")' >>>>> >>>>>The error seems to originate from FalconJx, it is thrown in >>>>>JSCSSCompilationSession.java... Now, my sources are fresh, I've >>>>>rebuild the SDK (super-clean main), all compiler projects (wipe main) >>>>>and the FlexUI.swc. Am I missing something (command line arg) or is >>>>>there some source not yet committed or something more obvious I'm >>>>>overlooking? >>>>> >>>>>These are my arguments: >>>>> >>>>>+env.PLAYERGLOBAL_HOME=/Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/dependencies/P >>>>>la >>>>>ye >>>>>rGlobal/player >>>>>+playerglobal.version=11.1 >>>>>-load-config="/Applications/Adobe Flash Builder >>>>>4.7/sdks/4.10.0/frameworks/flex-config.xml" >>>>>-library-path+=/Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/git/flex-asjs/framewor >>>>>ks >>>>>/a >>>>>s/libs/FlexJSUI.swc >>>>>-js-output-type=FLEXJS >>>>>-closure-lib=/Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/dependencies/GoogleClosu >>>>>re >>>>>/l >>>>>ibrary >>>>>-sdk-js-lib=/Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/git/flex-asjs/frameworks/ >>>>>js >>>>>/F >>>>>lexJS/src >>>>>/Users/erik/Documents/ApacheFlex/git/flex-asjs/examples/FlexJSTest_aga >>>>>in >>>>>/s >>>>>rc/FlexJSTest_again.mxml >>>>> >>>>>EdB >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>On Thu, Oct 31, 2013 at 6:37 AM, Erik de Bruin <e...@ixsoftware.nl> >>>>>wrote: >>>>>> I'll have a look at it today. >>>>>> >>>>>> EdB >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Wednesday, October 30, 2013, Peter Ent wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Thanks, Erik. Interesting read. FlexJS uses a lot of interfaces so >>>>>>>we'll >>>>>>> have to find a reasonable solution for this. We've managed to avoid >>>>>>>the >>>>>>> situation in JavaScript but it is coming up quickly. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> --peter >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On 10/30/13 3:10 PM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >Some guidance can be found here [1] and here [2]. >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >EdB >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >1: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>http://blogs.adobe.com/bparadie/2011/11/26/classes-inheritance-inte >>>>>>>>rf >>>>>>>>ac >>>>>>>>es- >>>>>>> >packages-and-namespaces/ >>>>>>> >2: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> > >>>>>>>>https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/FLEX/Simulating+AS3+lan >>>>>>>>gu >>>>>>>>ag >>>>>>>>e+f >>>>>>> >eatures+in+JavaScript+using+AMD+and+ES5 >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> > >>>>>>> >On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 8:07 PM, Erik de Bruin >>>>>>><e...@ixsoftware.nl> >>>>>>> > wrote: >>>>>>> >> "instanceof" doesn't check if an interface is implemented, >>>>>>>neither >>>>>>>in >>>>>>> >> Flex nor using Closure inheritance in JavaScript. What we need >>>>>>>for >>>>>>> >> runtime checking of interface implementation is an global "is" >>>>>>> >> function... I think I taught FalconJx to translate "ClassA is >>>>>>>ClassB" >>>>>>> >> as "is(ClassA, ClassB)". All we need to do now is to implement a >>>>>>> >> global "is()" function and somehow teach the compiler to keep >>>>>>>track >>>>>>>of >>>>>>> >> which classes implement which interfaces - all the way up the >>>>>>>chain >>>>>>> >> and sideways (interfaces can implement interfaces). >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> EdB >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> >>>>>>> >> On Wed, Oct 30, 2013 at 6:34 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> >>>>>>>wrote: >>>>>>> >>> Reviving this thread... >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> Peter says he wants to test to see if an object implements an >>>>>>> >>>interface at >>>>>>> >>> runtime. What mechanism do we want to use? >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> I don't think we need to make instanceof work, just have some >>>>>>>test >>>>>>>to >>>>>>> >>>call. >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> -Alex >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>> On 7/30/13 12:46 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> >>>>>>>wrote: >>>>>>> >>> >>>>>>> >>>>When using interfaces for type checking, there are two 'kinds': >>>>>>>at >>>>>>> >>>>compilation and at runtime. >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>The @interface and @implements annotations are for compile time >>>>>>> >>>>checking. >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>For runtime checking comes in two flavours: 'instanceof' and >>>>>>>'is'. >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>Our method of setting up inheritance (goog.inherits) maintains >>>>>>>the >>>>>>> >>>>inheritance chain, so 'instanceof' works out of the box. >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>The work starts with 'is'. We want to story the 'extends' and >>>>>>> >>>>'implements' metadata from AS in the JS classes and create a >>>>>>>method to >>>>>>> >>>>test against that metadata set. I have a pretty good idea on >>>>>>>how >>>>>>>to >>>>>>> >>>>implement such a beast, but it will require some (ha!) >>>>>>>tinkering >>>>>>>with >>>>>>> >>>>the FlexJS JS framework and FalconJx. That will take some >>>>>>>time... >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>EdB >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> >>>>On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 9:17 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala >>>>>>> >>>><bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>> On Mon, Jul 29, 2013 at 11:20 AM, Alex Harui >>>>>>><aha...@adobe.com> >>>>>>> >>>>>wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> I think FalconJS was going to generate something like: >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> if (child != undefined && >>>>>>> >>>>>> child.$implements["org.apache.flex.core.IChrome"]) >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> Not sure what it was going to do for classes, maybe chase >>>>>>>the >>>>>>> >>>>>>prototype >>>>>>> >>>>>> chain? >>>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>> The other thing that occurred to me about $implements or >>>>>>> >>>>>>child.is(IChrome) >>>>>>> >>>>>> is that all objects must then have these properties or >>>>>>>functions >>>>>>> >>>>>>where >>>>>>> >>>>>>the >>>>>>> >>>>>> global function >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software >>>>>> >>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27 >>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht >>>>>> >>>>>> T. 06-51952295 >>>>>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>-- >>>>>Ix Multimedia Software >>>>> >>>>>Jan Luykenstraat 27 >>>>>3521 VB Utrecht >>>>> >>>>>T. 06-51952295 >>>>>I. www.ixsoftware.nl >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>>-- >>>Ix Multimedia Software >>> >>>Jan Luykenstraat 27 >>>3521 VB Utrecht >>> >>>T. 06-51952295 >>>I. www.ixsoftware.nl >> > > > >-- >Ix Multimedia Software > >Jan Luykenstraat 27 >3521 VB Utrecht > >T. 06-51952295 >I. www.ixsoftware.nl
