On Wed, Nov 6, 2013 at 4:42 PM, Gordon Smith <gosm...@adobe.com> wrote:
> I don't understand this part: > > --- > Code changes > > A change made to a codebase of the project and committed by a committer. > This includes source code, documentation, website content, etc > > Lazy Consensus approval of committers. > --- > > Are you talking about when there is a controversy over a code change? > > - Gordon > > It means that every commit is lazily approved by all the committers. If someone has a problem with any commit, they have to explicitly veto it. Thanks, Om > > > -----Original Message----- > From: Justin Mclean [mailto:jus...@classsoftware.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 06, 2013 4:12 PM > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: Project voting guidelines > > Hi, > > Anyone else? Do people think they are in a good enough start to start a > VOTE? And would Lazy 2/3 majority of PMC members be the voting system to > use? > > Thanks, > Justin >
