Awesome.  I hope you are correct.

On 12/10/13 2:32 PM, "Maurice Amsellem" <maurice.amsel...@systar.com>
wrote:

>When you connect to https://builds.apache.org/computer/windows1/
>
>It says just below the title "Connected through JNLP"
>
>I have compared with my own installation and there is a notable
>difference:
>
>b.a.o:
>
>sun.java.command       F:\hudson\hudson-slave\slave.jar -jnlpUrl
>https://builds.apache.org/computer/windows1/slave-agent.jnlp -secret
>2ac5728b916b5d3992b88fa28b8ed9ae243a057fde8e08bd16a32cd327264fb1
>
>my Jenkins:
>sun.java.command       com.sun.javaws.Main
>C:\Users\amsellem\AppData\Local\Temp\javaws2
>
>
>According to Jenkins doc, the b.a.o launch method is used for headless
>slaves, so that would explain why it does not get a window.
>
>I am trying to do the same now and let you know.
>
>-----Message d'origine-----
>De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com]
>Envoyé : mardi 10 décembre 2013 23:22
>À : dev@flex.apache.org
>Objet : Re: [Builds/Jenkins] Help and advise needed
>
>Saw it.  Have we asked him if the Flex build is running in a slave and
>the slave has a window?
>
>On 12/10/13 2:17 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>>Here is Gavin's response a minute ago:
>>
>>=================
>>> Gavin,
>>>
>>> Can you please copy-paste this line into a command prompt and tell us
>>>what  the result is:
>>>
>>> "%PIXELBENDER_HOME%\pbutil.exe"
>>> "F:\hudson\hudson-slave\workspace\flex-
>>> sdk\frameworks\projects\framework\src\mx\graphics\shaderClasses\Color.
>>> pbk"
>>> "F:\hudson\hudson-slave\workspace\flex-
>>> sdk\frameworks\projects\framework\src\mx\graphics\shaderClasses\Color.
>>> pbj"
>>>
>>> (mind the wrap)
>>>
>>> Thanks!
>>
>>Result is a slight pause, then the prompt returns. No error, no output.
>>
>>(PixelBender is where its meant to be, PIXELBENDER_HOME is a user
>>variable.)
>>
>>Let me know what's next to check , thanks
>>
>>Gav...
>>=================
>>
>>
>>On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 2:15 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
>><bigosma...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>
>>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 1:58 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Don't know, but if you can prove that the slave can be configured in
>>>>a way  that it won't run, then we have a more specific question to
>>>>ask infra.
>>>>
>>>> -Alex
>>>>
>>>
>>> Wow, this is like CSI ;-)
>>>
>>> Here is what we know.  Gavin recently installed a new slave
>>>(windows2) I  am guessing that something was probably changed in the
>>>way slaves are run.
>>>
>>> BTW, here is another piece of information.  This is the system info
>>> for
>>> windows1:
>>>
>>> https://builds.apache.org/computer/windows1/systemInfo
>>>
>>> Anything looks out of the ordinary?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Om
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>
>>>> On 12/10/13 1:55 PM, "Maurice Amsellem"
>>>> <maurice.amsel...@systar.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> >According to jenkins gui, there are 4 ways of starting the slave :
>>>> >- Java web start (JNLP)
>>>> >- command line from master
>>>> >- via SSH on Unix machines
>>>> >- as a Windows Service.
>>>> >
>>>> >I am using JNLP, but maybe the other launch methods don't get a
>>>>window.
>>>> >I am going to try "as a Windows Service".
>>>> >
>>>> >Is there a way to know how the slave is launched on b.a.o?
>>>> >
>>>> >Maurice
>>>> >-----Message d'origine-----
>>>> >De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mardi 10
>>>> >décembre 2013 22:46 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re:
>>>> >[Builds/Jenkins] Help and advise needed
>>>> >
>>>> >InterestingŠ  Is there a way to configure a slave so it doesn't get
>>>> >a window?  Maybe Infra changed some default on builds.a.o.
>>>> >
>>>> >On 12/10/13 1:44 PM, "Maurice Amsellem"
>>>> ><maurice.amsel...@systar.com>
>>>> >wrote:
>>>> >
>>>> >>Now run the same build on a slave node (that gets a windows
>>>> >>"jenkins slave agent", that is visible on the desktop ):
>>>> >>
>>>> >>Remote build on windowsSlave1 in workspace
>>>> >>D:\Jenkins\node1\workspace\workspace\Test_pixel_bender
>>>> >>[framework] $ cmd.exe /C '"ant.bat -file build.xml
>>>>pixelbender-compile
>>>> >>&& exit %%ERRORLEVEL%%"'
>>>> >>ANT_OPTS=-Xms256m -Xmx1024m -XX:PermSize=64m -XX:MaxPermSize=512m
>>>> >>-XX:MaxHeapSize=512m -XX:+CMSClassUnloadingEnabled
>>>> >>-Djava.net.preferIPv4Stack=true
>>>> >>Buildfile:
>>>>
>>>>>>D:\ApacheFlex\git_source\flex-sdk\frameworks\projects\framework\build
>>>>>>.
>>>>>>x
>>>> >>ml
>>>> >>
>>>> >>pixelbender-compile:
>>>> >>     [exec] Device: 005EC1C4 has video RAM(MB): 512
>>>> >>     [exec] Vendor string:    NVIDIA Corporation
>>>> >>     [exec] Renderer string:  NVS 4200M/PCI/SSE2
>>>> >>     [exec] Version string:   3.0.0
>>>> >>     [exec]
>>>> >>     [exec] OpenGL version as determined by Extensionator...
>>>> >>     [exec] OpenGL Version 3.0
>>>> >>     [exec] Has NPOT support: TRUE
>>>> >>     [exec] Has Framebuffer Obeject Extension support: TRUE
>>>> >>     [exec] Completed shader test!
>>>> >>     [exec] Return code: 7
>>>> >>     [exec] Result: 7
>>>> >>BUILD SUCCESSFUL
>>>> >>Total time: 8 seconds
>>>> >>Finished: SUCCESS
>>>> >>
>>>> >>Well, that's a difference.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>Maurice
>>>> >>
>>>> >>-----Message d'origine-----
>>>> >>De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mardi 10
>>>> >>décembre
>>>> >>2013 22:40 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: [Builds/Jenkins]
>>>> >>Help and advise needed
>>>> >>
>>>> >>Nice.  Thanks for sticking with it.
>>>> >>
>>>> >>On 12/10/13 1:21 PM, "Maurice Amsellem"
>>>> >><maurice.amsel...@systar.com>
>>>> >>wrote:
>>>> >>
>>>> >>>So I just installed Jenkins on my PC, running inside Tomcat 6
>>>> >>>64bit
>>>>(
>>>> >>>Tomcat is running as a Windows Service).
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>- Created a simple job, on the "master" node, than starts
>>>> >>>flex-sdk\frameworks\projects\framework\build.xml
>>>>"pixelbender-compile"
>>>> >>>target
>>>> >>>- Jenkins output of the job:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>pixelbender-compile:
>>>> >>>     [exec] AIF Internal exception
>>>> >>>     [exec] Device: 008BB2BC has video RAM(MB): 3844
>>>> >>>     [exec] Device: 008BB2BC has video RAM(MB): 512
>>>> >>>     [exec] Return code: 1
>>>> >>>     [exec] Result: 1
>>>> >>>     [exec] ERROR: AIF Internal exception
>>>> >>>     [exec] Result: 1
>>>> >>>     [exec] ERROR: AIF Internal exception
>>>> >>>     [exec] Result: 1
>>>> >>>     [exec] ERROR: AIF Internal exception
>>>> >>>     [exec] Result: 1
>>>> >>>     [exec] ERROR: AIF Internal exception
>>>> >>>     [exec] Result: 1
>>>> >>>     [exec] ERROR: AIF Internal exception
>>>> >>>     [exec] Result: 1
>>>> >>>     [exec] ERROR: AIF Internal exception
>>>> >>>     [exec] Result: 1
>>>> >>>     [exec] ERROR: AIF Internal exception
>>>> >>>     [exec] Result: 1
>>>> >>>     [exec] ERROR: AIF Internal exception
>>>> >>>     [exec] Result: 1
>>>> >>>     [exec] ERROR: AIF Internal exception
>>>> >>>     [exec] Result: 1
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>So I am getting the same error.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>Om says "master" does not get a window, so this result seems to
>>>> >>>be normal.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>I am trying now to create a slave node and run the job on it.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>Maurice
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>-----Message d'origine-----
>>>> >>>De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com]
>>>> >>>Envoyé : mardi 10 décembre 2013 22:07 À : dev@flex.apache.org
>>>> >>>Objet : RE: [Builds/Jenkins] Help and advise needed
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>It was from the command line (cmd ant ), so gets a window.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>I am trying now from Jenkins service, but needs to install it
>>>>first...
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>Maurice
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>-----Message d'origine-----
>>>> >>>De : omup...@gmail.com [mailto:omup...@gmail.com] De la part de
>>>> >>>OmPrakash Muppirala Envoyé : mardi 10 décembre 2013 20:49 À :
>>>> >>>dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: [Builds/Jenkins] Help and advise
>>>> >>>needed
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>Maurice,
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>When you ran it on your machine, was it on Cygwin or from Jenkins?
>>>> >>>I think there is a difference.  On Jenkins, the main executor
>>>>(master)
>>>> >>>does not get a window.  Only slave executors are configured to
>>>> >>>get a window.
>>>> >>>Whereas Cygwin does not have such restrictions.
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>Thanks,
>>>> >>>Om
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 11:46 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com>
>>>>wrote:
>>>> >>>
>>>> >>>> I have no idea what to do with that information.  But thanks
>>>> >>>>for trying.
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> On 12/10/13 11:44 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
>>>> >>>> <maurice.amsel...@systar.com>
>>>> >>>> wrote:
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> >So this is the output from the b.a.o box:
>>>> >>>> >
>>>> >>>> >pixelbender-compile:
>>>> >>>> >     [exec] Device: 004C5F24 has video RAM(MB): 3736
>>>> >>>> >     [exec] AIF Internal exception
>>>> >>>> >     [exec] Return code: 1
>>>> >>>> >     [exec] Result: 1
>>>> >>>> >
>>>> >>>> >To be compared to the output on my PC:
>>>> >>>> >pixelbender-compile
>>>> >>>> >exec
>>>> >>>> >Device: 00633CEC has video RAM(MB): 512
>>>> >>>> >Vendor string:    NVIDIA Corporation
>>>> >>>> >Renderer string:  NVS 4200M/PCI/SSE2
>>>> >>>> >Version string:   3.0.0
>>>> >>>> >
>>>> >>>> >OpenGL version as determined by Extensionator...
>>>> >>>> >OpenGL Version 3.0
>>>> >>>> >Has NPOT support: TRUE
>>>> >>>> >Has Framebuffer Obeject Extension support: TRUE Completed
>>>> >>>> >shader test!
>>>> >>>> >Return code: 7
>>>> >>>> >Result: 7
>>>> >>>> >Exec
>>>> >>>> >
>>>> >>>> >That does not tell much, except that there seems to be an
>>>> >>>> >issue with accessing the GPU.
>>>> >>>> >
>>>> >>>> >Shall I un-commit the change now, or do you want to perform
>>>> >>>> >more tests
>>>> >>>>?
>>>> >>>> >
>>>> >>>> >Maurice
>>>> >>>> >
>>>> >>>> >-----Message d'origine-----
>>>> >>>> >De : Maurice Amsellem [mailto:maurice.amsel...@systar.com]
>>>> >>>> >Envoyé : mardi 10 décembre 2013 20:37 À :
>>>>dev@flex.apache.orgObjet :
>>>> >>>> >RE: [Builds/Jenkins] Help and advise needed
>>>> >>>> >
>>>> >>>> >I don't have a Mac with ApacheFlex SDK for testing.
>>>> >>>> >
>>>> >>>> >Can you try on your side, please ?
>>>> >>>> >
>>>> >>>> >-----Message d'origine-----
>>>> >>>> >De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mardi 10
>>>> >>>> >décembre
>>>> >>>> >2013
>>>> >>>> >20:34 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re: [Builds/Jenkins]
>>>> >>>> >Help
>>>>and
>>>> >>>> >advise needed
>>>> >>>> >
>>>> >>>> >Won't that break Mac builds?
>>>> >>>> >
>>>> >>>> >On 12/10/13 11:32 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
>>>> >>>> ><maurice.amsel...@systar.com>
>>>> >>>> >wrote:
>>>> >>>> >
>>>> >>>> >>Alex, it's one line to change in the build.xml
>>>> >>>> >>
>>>> >>>> >><exec executable="${env.PIXELBENDER_HOME}/sniffer_gpu.exe"/>
>>>> >>>> >>
>>>> >>>> >>I will give it a try and we will know in 15 min.
>>>> >>>> >>
>>>> >>>> >>I am sure the result will be interesting.
>>>> >>>> >>
>>>> >>>> >>Anyway, it can't hurt ;-)
>>>> >>>> >>
>>>> >>>> >>Maurice
>>>> >>>> >>
>>>> >>>> >>-----Message d'origine-----
>>>> >>>> >>De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mardi 10
>>>> >>>> >>décembre
>>>> >>>> >>2013 20:29 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re:
>>>> >>>> >>[Builds/Jenkins] Help and advise needed
>>>> >>>> >>
>>>> >>>> >>I think I'll wait to see how Gavin responds to Erik's latest
>>>> >>>>request.
>>>> >>>> >>
>>>> >>>> >>BTW, thanks for finding out about the tool.
>>>> >>>> >>
>>>> >>>> >>-Alex
>>>> >>>> >>
>>>> >>>> >>On 12/10/13 11:27 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
>>>> >>>> >><maurice.amsel...@systar.com>
>>>> >>>> >>wrote:
>>>> >>>> >>
>>>> >>>> >>>Sure, if you can ask him.
>>>> >>>> >>>
>>>> >>>> >>>Maurice
>>>> >>>> >>>
>>>> >>>> >>>-----Message d'origine-----
>>>> >>>> >>>De : Alex Harui [mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mardi 10
>>>> >>>> >>>décembre
>>>> >>>> >>>2013 20:26 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re:
>>>> >>>> >>>[Builds/Jenkins] Help and advise needed
>>>> >>>> >>>
>>>> >>>> >>>Might be simpler just to ask Gavin to run the tool?
>>>> >>>> >>>
>>>> >>>> >>>On 12/10/13 11:12 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
>>>> >>>> >>><maurice.amsel...@systar.com>
>>>> >>>> >>>wrote:
>>>> >>>> >>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>There is a utility in pixel bender toolkit directory called
>>>> >>>> >>>>"sniffer_gpu.exe" that check the presence and version of
>>>>OpenGL:
>>>> >>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>Console output on my laptop is below:
>>>> >>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>C:\Program Files (x86)\Adobe\Adobe Utilities - CS5\Pixel
>>>>Bender
>>>> >>>> >>>>Toolkit
>>>> >>>> >>>>2>sniffer_gpu.exe
>>>> >>>> >>>>Device: 0058A9F4 has video RAM(MB): 512
>>>> >>>> >>>>Vendor string:    NVIDIA Corporation
>>>> >>>> >>>>Renderer string:  NVS 4200M/PCI/SSE2
>>>> >>>> >>>>Version string:   3.0.0
>>>> >>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>OpenGL version as determined by Extensionator...
>>>> >>>> >>>>OpenGL Version 3.0
>>>> >>>> >>>>Has NPOT support: TRUE
>>>> >>>> >>>>Has Framebuffer Obeject Extension support: TRUE Completed
>>>>shader
>>>> >>>>test!
>>>> >>>> >>>>Return code: 7
>>>> >>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>Maybe we could temporarily modify the build to run this
>>>>utility
>>>> >>>> >>>>and show the output on the b.a.o vm.
>>>> >>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>WDYT ?
>>>> >>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>Maurice
>>>> >>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>-----Message d'origine----- De : Alex Harui
>>>> >>>> >>>>[mailto:aha...@adobe.com] Envoyé : mardi 10 décembre
>>>> >>>> >>>>2013 18:15 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re:
>>>>[Builds/Jenkins]
>>>> >>>> >>>>Help and advise needed
>>>> >>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>I don't think we actually know the cause of the problem.  I
>>>> >>>> >>>>am going to continue to spend cycles to try to find out
>>>>though.
>>>> >>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>It would be nice to have an alternative to builds.a.o.  I'm
>>>>not
>>>> >>>> >>>>sure if it will cost Om money to run a builds server.
>>>> >>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>-Alex
>>>> >>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>On 12/10/13 2:01 AM, "Maurice Amsellem"
>>>> >>>> >>>><maurice.amsel...@systar.com>
>>>> >>>> >>>>wrote:
>>>> >>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>I understand that.
>>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>Actually, my "understanding" on this issue was that pixel
>>>> >>>> >>>>>bender compiler required some sort of hardware
>>>> >>>> >>>>>configuration (OpenGL,
>>>> >>>> >>>>>etc...) that were not present on the b.a.o. new Windows
>>>>Jenkins
>>>> >>>> >>>>>slave node, so that's why the build was failing,  and the
>>>> >>>> >>>>>Apache Infra was reluctant to let us modify anything, or
>>>> >>>> >>>>>even access the VM ourselves.
>>>> >>>> >>>>>So that's why I was proposing a "software only" solution.
>>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>Now, it seems from what Om is saying that we can set up
>>>> >>>> >>>>>and
>>>>use
>>>> >>>> >>>>>our own Jenkins slave node VM.
>>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>That, of course, is much preferable...
>>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>Maurice
>>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>-----Message d'origine----- De : Erik de Bruin
>>>> >>>> >>>>>[mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl] Envoyé : mardi
>>>> >>>> >>>>>10 décembre 2013 10:44 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re:
>>>> >>>> >>>>>[Builds/Jenkins] Help and advise needed
>>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>Maurice,
>>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>Your help is very much appreciated!
>>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>I put "legal" in quotes, the issue is not really one of
>>>> >>>> >>>>>the law, more of the rules. An Apache release is supposed
>>>> >>>> >>>>>to be 'source only', and we if we can produce needed
>>>> >>>> >>>>>binaries from source, we keep only the source, not the
>>>> >>>> >>>>>artefacts
>>>>themselves in
>>>> >>>>the repo.
>>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>EdB
>>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 10:34 AM, Maurice Amsellem
>>>> >>>> >>>>><maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote:
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>In addition to the various "legal" issues with binaries
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>in the
>>>> >>>>repo.
>>>> >>>> >>>>>> I understand it's not a good idea to have binaries in
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>the repo, so I won't insist.
>>>> >>>> >>>>>> But please can you explain what are the legal issues of
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>having binaries in the repo?  Is this because of Adobe,
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>or
>>>>ASF
>>>> >>>>rules ?
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>> On a side note, I was just trying to help, with my
>>>> >>>> >>>>>> limited understanding and knowledge, and because the
>>>> >>>> >>>>>> email thread
>>>>was
>>>> >>>> >>>>>> titled "help and advise needed" ;-)
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>> Regards,
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>> Maurice
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>> -----Message d'origine----- De : Erik de Bruin
>>>> >>>> >>>>>> [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl] Envoyé :
>>>>mardi
>>>> >>>> >>>>>> 10 décembre 2013 09:12 À : dev@flex.apache.org Objet : Re:
>>>> >>>> >>>>>> [Builds/Jenkins] Help and advise needed
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>> In addition to the various "legal" issues with binaries
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>in the repo, we'd be masking the cause of this failure.
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>In
>>>>order
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>to prevent further deterioration of the build process, we
>>>>need
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>to figure out what went wrong and fix it.
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>> EdB
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>> PS. Thanks for leaving the keyboard on the Mustella VM
>>>> >>>> >>>>>> set
>>>>to
>>>> >>>>FR...
>>>> >>>> >>>>>> Took me while to figure out that I hadn't gone insane or
>>>> >>>> >>>>>> if my keyboard was broken ;-)
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Dec 10, 2013 at 9:04 AM, Maurice Amsellem
>>>> >>>> >>>>>><maurice.amsel...@systar.com> wrote:
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> someone who does use the pbj's will grab the nightly
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>> and
>>>> >>>>complain.
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> I don't understand.
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> Why would someone complain if the pbj's are in the
>>>>nightly?
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> [From the other emai]
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>Apache repos aren't supposed to contain compiled code.
>>>>The
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>pbj files were removed during the initial release audit.
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>I don't think a workaround can involve checking in the
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>pbj
>>>> >>>>files.
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>But we could borrow them from a prior release package
>>>> >>>>temporarily.
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>So we could make the compilation conditional on a env
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>parameter, and set that in the Jenkins job accordingly?
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>>Yes but ...
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> Alex, the conversation is getting out synch, so I am
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>not sure that I have understood what you said.
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> So can we include the pbj in the repo, and have a
>>>>parameter
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>to conditionally compile the pbj ?
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> - This parameter would be set by default to do the
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>compilation (so that folks can recompile)
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> - and turned off on the b.a.o vm, with pre-compiled
>>>>pbj's.
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>> Maurice
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>> --
>>>> >>>> >>>>>> Ix Multimedia Software
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>> Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>>> >>>> >>>>>> 3521 VB Utrecht
>>>> >>>> >>>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>> T. 06-51952295
>>>> >>>> >>>>>> I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>--
>>>> >>>> >>>>>Ix Multimedia Software
>>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>Jan Luykenstraat 27
>>>> >>>> >>>>>3521 VB Utrecht
>>>> >>>> >>>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>>>T. 06-51952295
>>>> >>>> >>>>>I. www.ixsoftware.nl
>>>> >>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>> >>>
>>>> >>>> >>
>>>> >>>> >
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>>>
>>>> >>
>>>> >
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>

Reply via email to