In the bug, the user seems to want to see time increasing while time < startDelay. Is that what you think should happen too, or should it be 0 or NaN? If it should just increase, I don't understand the point of including startDelay.
On 12/16/13 2:22 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: >Hi, > >> It is a bit scary since the documentation took the time to mention that >> playheadTime includes startDelay. >Yes it should include the time from 0 up to and including startDelay, but >it shouldn't be adding the full value of startDelay to it before it has >happened. > >On a time line you have in order: >startDelay period >duration period >repeatDelay period >duration period >repeatDelay period > >etc etc > >Also a bit scary use of _playheadTime vs playheadTime in the code as >currently one include + startDelay and one doesn't. > >Justin >
