The only drawback of doing this is that some static methods in ExpressionCache
that are currently static should become instance methods, consuming a little
bit more of memory, the difference is low because I can't see any cases where
one has 1000s debugging sessions opened in the same time, so, it is acceptable
IMO.
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: FDB vs FB debugging ?
> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 10:59:37 +0000
>
> Sounds good to me, I'll just rename IDEA- to IDE- :-) and maybe keep -ide
> instead of -escaped-var-values if we need something else applied for IDEs
> later.
>
> Any other thoughts ?
>
> Thanks,
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
> > Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:44:12 +0400
> > From: alexander.doros...@jetbrains.com
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Subject: Re: FDB vs FB debugging ?
> >
> > Yes, something like fdb -escaped-var-values.
> > If enabled then there's no need in start/end markers (like
> > "IDEA-ESCAPE-START"/"IDEA-ESCAPE-END"), as var values are always
> > escaped. Implementation of escape() method is there in my StringUtil class.
> >
> > On 17.01.2014 14:33, Frédéric THOMAS wrote:
> > > hum, what do you mean, something like "fdb -ide" ?
> > >
> > > Frédéric THOMAS
> > >
> > >> Date: Fri, 17 Jan 2014 14:29:32 +0400
> > >> From: alexander.doros...@jetbrains.com
> > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > >> Subject: Re: FDB vs FB debugging ?
> > >>
> > >>> Ok, I got your point, the only thing I'm thinking about could be to
> > >>> introduce a new first level helper command which would set a boolean
> > >>> value to apply this escapes, does it make sense ?
> > >> Or may be just add undocumented command line option.
> > >
> >
>
