On 3/15/14 9:59 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:

>Hi,
>
>> 1) Justin voted -1 and listed several issues.  I'm still looking for
>> enough information to try to reproduce "Error: Inconsistant linkage in
>> 
>>/Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlexDevelopGit/frameworks/libs/air/ai
>>rg
>> lobal.swc(flash.utils:ByteArray, flash.utils:CompressionAlgorithm,
>> flash.utils:IDataInput2, flash.utils:IDataOutput2) -
>> 'flash.utils:ByteArray' is marked as extern, but
>>'flash.utils:IDataInput2'
>> is not"
>> Justin: can you provide the steps to reproduce?
>Change FLEX_HOME to point to a 4.12 SDK, (that's been set up with AIR
>4.0) and try run ant in ant_for_air directory.
Couldn't repro.  What is AIR_HOME pointing to?  BTW, I was able to
reproduce the "invalid application descriptor" issue by pointing AIR_HOME
to AIR 3.9.  But I can't repro this "Inconsistent Linkage" issue.  In the
vote thread you mentioned someone about the "Latest SDK" and "Latest
develop branch" so I'm not sure how those factor in.

>
>> 2) The Installer apparently has not and does not provide the correct
>>build
>> numbers for the RSLs for 4.11 and older releases (except for
>> OSMF.swc/swf).  IOW, this is a bug in Installer 2.7 that is not fixed
>>for
>> older releases.  The installer.xml for 4.12 looks like it is providing
>>the
>> correct build numbers.
>Yep in 4.12 the RSL numbers is correct so I don't see this as a show
>stopper, but it would still be nice to fix. Users will run into this
>issue and we'll have to spend time and effort in telling they how to fix
>it.
Are you going to vote -1 unless I fix it?

>
>> 3) The README incorrectly states that the ant_on_air build will pick up
>> FLEX_HOME_WIN and FLEX_HOME_MAC environment variables and no longer
>>states
>> that the installer build will.  Since the README is not in the source
>>kit,
>> I was going to change the README, make a new tag, then post RC7 with the
>> modified README.
>The README is in the source release so this would mean the signatures
>would no longer be valid.
Yes, you're right, I keep forgetting the build.xml is not at the
top-level.  What do others think should we fix the README in an R8 or ship
as is?

>
>Also the locale issue is a -1 for me even if the issue is elsewhere, we
>can't release the installer if there an issue like this.  If you look at
>the installs of 4.12 only about 16% of installs are from the USA.
I guess the folks who tested the installer must have the right locales for
their projects otherwise we'd be seeing more complaints?  IMO this mainly
affects using 4.12 installed with the new installer to compile the
installer?  What do other's think?  Should we hold off on this installer
until we fix 4.12?

-Alex

Reply via email to