On Mar 15, 2014 11:11 PM, "Alex Harui" <aha...@adobe.com> wrote: > > > > On 3/15/14 9:59 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote: > > >Hi, > > > >> 1) Justin voted -1 and listed several issues. I'm still looking for > >> enough information to try to reproduce "Error: Inconsistant linkage in > >> > >>/Users/justinmclean/Documents/ApacheFlexDevelopGit/frameworks/libs/air/ai > >>rg > >> lobal.swc(flash.utils:ByteArray, flash.utils:CompressionAlgorithm, > >> flash.utils:IDataInput2, flash.utils:IDataOutput2) - > >> 'flash.utils:ByteArray' is marked as extern, but > >>'flash.utils:IDataInput2' > >> is not" > >> Justin: can you provide the steps to reproduce? > >Change FLEX_HOME to point to a 4.12 SDK, (that's been set up with AIR > >4.0) and try run ant in ant_for_air directory. > Couldn't repro. What is AIR_HOME pointing to? BTW, I was able to > reproduce the "invalid application descriptor" issue by pointing AIR_HOME > to AIR 3.9. But I can't repro this "Inconsistent Linkage" issue. In the > vote thread you mentioned someone about the "Latest SDK" and "Latest > develop branch" so I'm not sure how those factor in. > > > > >> 2) The Installer apparently has not and does not provide the correct > >>build > >> numbers for the RSLs for 4.11 and older releases (except for > >> OSMF.swc/swf). IOW, this is a bug in Installer 2.7 that is not fixed > >>for > >> older releases. The installer.xml for 4.12 looks like it is providing > >>the > >> correct build numbers. > >Yep in 4.12 the RSL numbers is correct so I don't see this as a show > >stopper, but it would still be nice to fix. Users will run into this > >issue and we'll have to spend time and effort in telling they how to fix > >it. > Are you going to vote -1 unless I fix it? > > > > >> 3) The README incorrectly states that the ant_on_air build will pick up > >> FLEX_HOME_WIN and FLEX_HOME_MAC environment variables and no longer > >>states > >> that the installer build will. Since the README is not in the source > >>kit, > >> I was going to change the README, make a new tag, then post RC7 with the > >> modified README. > >The README is in the source release so this would mean the signatures > >would no longer be valid. > Yes, you're right, I keep forgetting the build.xml is not at the > top-level. What do others think should we fix the README in an R8 or ship > as is? > > > > >Also the locale issue is a -1 for me even if the issue is elsewhere, we > >can't release the installer if there an issue like this. If you look at > >the installs of 4.12 only about 16% of installs are from the USA. > I guess the folks who tested the installer must have the right locales for > their projects otherwise we'd be seeing more complaints? IMO this mainly > affects using 4.12 installed with the new installer to compile the > installer? What do other's think? Should we hold off on this installer > until we fix 4.12? > > -Alex
I personally would like you to go back to concentrating on FlexJS, so, yes, let's pop the champagne on Installer 3.0. We can always do a 3.1 if we get a lot of people complain. Thanks, Om >
