On 4/10/14 4:19 PM, "Justin Mclean" <jus...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi, > >> I would definitely like to get FlexJS out soon so we can generate some >> buzz and hopefully get a few more folks to join us at 360|Flex. >+1 to that. > >> So: >> 1) Should we close the vote on Installer 3.0 and post it to the release >> server and just not announce it >If it's a release you need to announce it. Do we have to announce it at the moment we push the bits to dist/release? > >> One potential problem is that if folks then use that installer >> to install a regular SDK >You could release a version of the installer just for FlexJS. All that >would be needed is a different config file right? I know the whole point >was to decouple SDK/installer release cycles but it seems a less risky >option to me and wouldn't require a 4.12.1 release right? Seems like more work. We'd have to have a separate app id and then we'd have two out there to support. And, its another cycle of voting. > >> 2) what else do we want to fix in 4.12.1? > >Here's a couple of important ones: >FLEX-34209 fix parsing of hours between 12pm and 1pm >FLEX-34132 stop "[object Object]" from showing in blank columns I'd say we fix these two and crank out a 4.12.1. If you can jam anything else in there feel free to do so. I can look at FLEX-34132 if you want. Thoughts? -Alex
