I ended up creating one test method by sequence I wanted to test and it works
well.
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [FlexUnit] More than 1 SequenceRunner.addAssertHandler ?
> Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 17:35:17 +0100
>
> Actually, unfortunately, it seems it is the same, I still need help on it
> then:
>
>
>
> [Test(async, description="Verify the Thread State sequence
> New->Running->Terminated")]
> public function testNewToRunningToTerminate():void {
> testStateNew();
>
> const startRunner:SequenceRunner = createStateSequenceRunner(_thread,
> _thread.start, thread_stateRunning);
> startRunner.run();
>
> const terminateRunner:SequenceRunner =
> createStateSequenceRunner(_thread, _thread.terminate, thread_stateTerminate);
> terminateRunner.run();
> }
>
> private function createStateSequenceRunner(target:IEventDispatcher,
> method:Function, assertHandler:Function, args:Array = null,
> argsFunction:Function = null, timeout:int = 500):SequenceRunner {
> const runner:SequenceRunner = new SequenceRunner(this);
>
> runner.addStep(new SequenceCaller(target, method, args,
> argsFunction));
> runner.addStep(new SequenceWaiter(target,
> ThreadStateEvent.THREAD_STATE, timeout));
> runner.addAssertHandler(assertHandler, null);
>
> return runner;
> }
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
> > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > Subject: RE: [FlexUnit] More than 1 SequenceRunner.addAssertHandler ?
> > Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:43:05 +0100
> >
> > Well, it seems the answer is to create more SequenceRunner :P
> >
> > Frédéric THOMAS
> >
> > > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > > Subject: RE: [FlexUnit] More than 1 SequenceRunner.addAssertHandler ?
> > > Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:23:10 +0100
> > >
> > > I meant,
> > > It looks like it uses the first addAssertHandler in both cases.
> > > Frédéric THOMAS
> > >
> > > > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> > > > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> > > > Subject: [FlexUnit] More than 1 SequenceRunner.addAssertHandler ?
> > > > Date: Thu, 19 Jun 2014 16:18:27 +0100
> > > >
> > > > Hi,
> > > >
> > > > I'm trying to use the SequenceRunner for the first time and facing a
> > > > problem, it seems I can't have more than one addAssertHandler by
> > > > SequenceRunner:
> > > >
> > > > It looks like it uses the last addAssertHandler in both cases.
> > > >
> > > > [Test(async, description="Verify the Thread State sequence
> > > > New->Running->Terminated")]
> > > > public function testNewToRunningToTerminate():void {
> > > > testStateNew();
> > > >
> > > > const runner:SequenceRunner = new SequenceRunner(this);
> > > >
> > > > runner.addStep(new SequenceCaller(_thread, _thread.start));
> > > > runner.addStep(new SequenceWaiter(_thread,
> > > > ThreadStateEvent.THREAD_STATE, 2000));
> > > >
> > > > // If I comment this one, everything works as expected.
> > > > runner.addAssertHandler(thread_stateRunning, null);
> > > >
> > > > runner.addStep(new SequenceWaiter(_thread,
> > > > ThreadResultEvent.RESULT, 2000));
> > > >
> > > > runner.addStep(new SequenceCaller(_thread, _thread.terminate));
> > > > runner.addStep(new SequenceWaiter(_thread,
> > > > ThreadStateEvent.THREAD_STATE, 2000));
> > > > runner.addAssertHandler(thread_stateTerminate, null);
> > > >
> > > > runner.run();
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > private function thread_stateRunning(e:ThreadStateEvent,
> > > > passThroughData:Object = null):void {
> > > > testStateRunning();
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > private function thread_stateTerminate(e:ThreadStateEvent,
> > > > passThroughData:Object = null):void {
> > > > testStateTerminated();
> > > > }
> > > >
> > > > What did I miss ?
> > > > How can I manage that ?
> > > >
> > > > Frédéric THOMAS
> > >
> >
>
