> 30+ bugs fixed and FDB debug support for AS3 workers. I think it is good
> enough for a 4.13 release.
+1.
In a more general way, as I guess at the time the release is done, the a +0.1
is automatically applied to the release number and then eventually downgraded
at the time of the next release, wouldn't it be more logical to do a +0.0.1
instead, meaning a minor upgrade by default and if enough bugs have been fixed,
improvement done, upgrade it manually to a +0.1 ?
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: bigosma...@gmail.com
> Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:55:20 -0700
> Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 RC1
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
>
> 30+ bugs fixed and FDB debug support for AS3 workers. I think it is good
> enough for a 4.13 release.
>
> Also, I think the AIR and Flash Player support must be moved from the
> differences from 4.12.1 section
>
> Differences from Apache Flex 4.12.1 include:
>
> AIR and Flash Player support
> ------------------------------
> - Support Flash Player 14.0
> - Support for AIR 14.0
>
>
> Technically, 4.12.1 also supports FP and AIR 14.0.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
>
> On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Look at the list of changes it does seem more like a 4.12.2 rather than a
> > 4.13.0. What do other people think?
> >
> > Justin
