@Alex,
I tried to run the script but had:
gpg: Signature made 06/23/14 14:30:36 using RSA key ID DA9CCFF2
gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found"
Is this normal ?
Frédéric THOMAS
> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 RC1
> Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 04:05:27 +0100
>
> > 30+ bugs fixed and FDB debug support for AS3 workers. I think it is good
> > enough for a 4.13 release.
>
> +1.
>
> In a more general way, as I guess at the time the release is done, the a +0.1
> is automatically applied to the release number and then eventually downgraded
> at the time of the next release, wouldn't it be more logical to do a +0.0.1
> instead, meaning a minor upgrade by default and if enough bugs have been
> fixed, improvement done, upgrade it manually to a +0.1 ?
>
> Frédéric THOMAS
>
> > From: bigosma...@gmail.com
> > Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:55:20 -0700
> > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 RC1
> > To: dev@flex.apache.org
> >
> > 30+ bugs fixed and FDB debug support for AS3 workers. I think it is good
> > enough for a 4.13 release.
> >
> > Also, I think the AIR and Flash Player support must be moved from the
> > differences from 4.12.1 section
> >
> > Differences from Apache Flex 4.12.1 include:
> >
> > AIR and Flash Player support
> > ------------------------------
> > - Support Flash Player 14.0
> > - Support for AIR 14.0
> >
> >
> > Technically, 4.12.1 also supports FP and AIR 14.0.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Om
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Look at the list of changes it does seem more like a 4.12.2 rather than a
> > > 4.13.0. What do other people think?
> > >
> > > Justin
>
