@Alex, I tried to run the script but had:
gpg: Signature made 06/23/14 14:30:36 using RSA key ID DA9CCFF2 gpg: Can't check signature: public key not found" Is this normal ? Frédéric THOMAS > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > To: dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: RE: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 RC1 > Date: Tue, 24 Jun 2014 04:05:27 +0100 > > > 30+ bugs fixed and FDB debug support for AS3 workers. I think it is good > > enough for a 4.13 release. > > +1. > > In a more general way, as I guess at the time the release is done, the a +0.1 > is automatically applied to the release number and then eventually downgraded > at the time of the next release, wouldn't it be more logical to do a +0.0.1 > instead, meaning a minor upgrade by default and if enough bugs have been > fixed, improvement done, upgrade it manually to a +0.1 ? > > Frédéric THOMAS > > > From: bigosma...@gmail.com > > Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2014 16:55:20 -0700 > > Subject: Re: [DISCUSS] Discuss Apache Flex SDK 4.13.0 RC1 > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > > > 30+ bugs fixed and FDB debug support for AS3 workers. I think it is good > > enough for a 4.13 release. > > > > Also, I think the AIR and Flash Player support must be moved from the > > differences from 4.12.1 section > > > > Differences from Apache Flex 4.12.1 include: > > > > AIR and Flash Player support > > ------------------------------ > > - Support Flash Player 14.0 > > - Support for AIR 14.0 > > > > > > Technically, 4.12.1 also supports FP and AIR 14.0. > > > > Thanks, > > Om > > > > > > On Mon, Jun 23, 2014 at 4:49 PM, Justin Mclean <jus...@classsoftware.com> > > wrote: > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > Look at the list of changes it does seem more like a 4.12.2 rather than a > > > 4.13.0. What do other people think? > > > > > > Justin >