On Wed, Jul 2, 2014 at 9:48 PM, Justin Mclean <[email protected]> wrote:
> Hi, > > I notice there quite a bit of difference between resulting SDKs when > installing with installer and by the recommend scripts. > > After sorting out the noise - an SDK produced by the installer is missing: > - Anything to do with producing asdocs this includes asdoc files in > project sub directories > - All build.xml, .actionScript, .flexLibProerties, .project and other > build files > - flash-integration > - frameworks/themes Ice Institutional Smoke Wooden > - lib/afe.jar and lib/aglj40.jar > - licenses in /lib/external/optional afe-LICENSE.htm, aglj40-LICENSE.htm, > flex-fontkit-LICENSE.htm, flex-messaging-common-LICENSE.htm, > rideau.jar-LICENSE.htm > > Some of this may because we're not bundling stuff into the binary, but > others (afe.jar + aglj40.jar) look like an installer issue. > Which ones are because of the Installer? We definitely want to fix them. We can probably live with the differences caused by the binary bundling issues. Thanks, Om > > Are we OK with all of this? > > Thanks, > Justin
