This RC seems to have stalled. Does the silence mean folks really want me to spend time fixing up RSL generation in the source kit? It is working fine for the binary kit via the installer which is what nearly everyone uses. IMO there are much bigger fish to fry. Just need one more vote then I'll add mine and we'll be done.
Thanks, -Alex On 7/4/14 12:14 AM, "Alex Harui" <[email protected]> wrote: > > >On 7/3/14 11:48 PM, "Justin Mclean" <[email protected]> wrote: > >>Hi, >> >>> 3) run ant frameworks-rsls. The frameworks/flex-config.xml still >>>contains >>> els entries like: >>> >>> <!-- Spark SWC--> >>> <runtime-shared-library-path> >>> <path-element>libs/spark.swc</path-element> >>> <rsl-url>spark_${build.number}.swf</rsl-url> >>> </runtime-shared-library-path> >>> >>> That doesn't seem right to me. Seems like that target or some other >>> target should fix up the flex-config, no? >> >>Doesn't seem right to me either, I would of expected frameworks-rsls to >>fill in the version numbers. >OK, and for the record, the constructFlexForIDE.sh is copying a >flex-config.xml from ide/flashbuilder/config that has 0 as the >build.number. It is checked into Git that way. That also seems wrong to >me. But again, IMO, not a show stopper. The vast majority of folks are >using the installer. > >-Alex >
