Hi, > The lucene link looks like it is doc for a java package of classes, not a > separate file in the release artifact.
It generated from the source and is in the release. > IMO, we can link to link AOO Which is exactly what we are doing in the RC. > Remember that the Flex SDK already has a category X dependency for the > optional embedded font jars. The code that calls the category X jars is > bundled in the one and only release artifact, but the code is set up such > that those category X jars can be missing. Which is exactly what the Squiggly release candidate is doing ie you can compile it even if the dictionary files are missing. > The mentors ruled that was sufficient because nobody "must" download the > category X jars to > successfully use the Flex SDK. And the Squiggly release candidate doesn't force you to to download any category X jars (or in this case LGPL data). So again we are in compliance.. > I would expect we would do the same for Squiggly. We are. > But if you want, we can ask on the legal-discuss thread. There is nothing that needs to be asked as the matter is resolved. Alex if you think it's not please put it to a VOTE. If and when legal come up with a clear response we'll abide by that and change if required how Squiggly is packackaged, or make it download LGPL code. And can people please take a look at the RC to see if there are any other issues we need to fix up. Thanks, Justin
