Oops, hit send by accident.. On 10/13/14, 9:56 AM, "Erik de Bruin" <e...@ixsoftware.nl> wrote:
>> >FalconJX should properly parse this construct. That will be challenging >though, as we’d need to look forward in the AST and then handle these >multiple catch blocks and turn them into a proper set of ‘if … then’ >statement in a single catch block. Not sure what you mean by “forward”, but there are other places in Falcon where we examine a node’s children. I’m not sure if there is any place we do serious AST re-writing as a result, but this sounds like a good place to do it. > >Also, how “heavy” is this problem? Are the catch nodes children of the >> try node? If so, could we just rewrite the AST there? >> > >Actually, hoping to get a blessing for rewriting the SDK, I didn’t look at >the AST at all :-) Again, ok with me, but won’t help some customer that has used this pattern extensively. -Alex
