IIRC, 11.1 is the only/latest version for which Adobe has promised support for Flex. Also, IIRC, some customers don’t like being forced to go to the latest.
That doesn’t mean we shouldn’t switch, but just more data for you to consider. -Alex On 2/2/15, 3:58 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" <mark.kessler....@usmc.mil> wrote: >+1 > >I like the idea of defaulting to newest version. Feels like we should >always push the latest of the dependencies when we can. > >-Mark > >-----Original Message----- >From: Erik de Bruin [mailto:e...@ixsoftware.nl] >Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 5:38 AM >To: dev@flex.apache.org >Subject: Time to switch from 11.1 to 16.0 as the default player version? > >Hi, > >Why don't we switch the SDK default player version from 11.1 to 16.0? > >The installer does this already, and it seems silly not to default to >the most recent - and therefor (presumably) secure - version of the >player, especially given the recent worries about the FP in the >popular press. > >Anyone needing legacy player support can easily create such an SDK >from source or via the Installer. > >Thoughts? > >EdB > > > >-- >Ix Multimedia Software > >Jan Luykenstraat 27 >3521 VB Utrecht > >T. 06-51952295 >I. www.ixsoftware.nl
