Hmm, tried again (twice) Still getting the same exact error.
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> SVN history shows some patterns that supposedly work correctly. I just
> updated to those. Give it a try.
>
> On 2/9/15, 11:48 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >Alex, any guess as to what could be happening here?
> >
> >Thanks,
> >Om
> >
> >On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:45 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> ><bigosma...@gmail.com>
> >wrote:
> >
> >> I added the attributes version="17.0b" versionID="17.0b"
> >>
> >> That doesn't seem to have fixed it.
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Om
> >>
> >> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:11 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> >><bigosma...@gmail.com
> >> > wrote:
> >>
> >>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> The call stack shows it is an <equals> tag. You can use the
> >>>>expressions
> >>>> window to view a tag instance’s xml property to see which tag it is.
> >>>>
> >>>> In this case, it is:
> >>>>
> >>>> <equals arg1="${flash.sdk.swfversion}"
> >>>> arg2="${flash.sdk.default.swfversion}"/>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> It appears that the install script is expecting the versionID in the
> >>>> installer config to be 17.0b
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> I see that "version" is set to 17.0. Should that be changed to 17.0b ?
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Om
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>> -Alex
> >>>>
> >>>> On 2/8/15, 11:18 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com>
> >>>>wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> >Okay, I got the same error during a debug run as well. Here is the
> >>>> stack
> >>>> >trace:
> >>>> >
> >>>> >TypeError: Error #1009: Cannot access a property or method of a null
> >>>> >object
> >>>> >reference.
> >>>> >at
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>org.apache.flex.ant::Ant/getValue()[C:\p\flexroot\git\flex-utilities\a
> >>>>>nt_o
> >>>> >n_air\src\org\apache\flex\ant\Ant.as:216]
> >>>> >at
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>org.apache.flex.ant.tags.supportClasses::TagHandler/getAttributeValue(
> >>>>>)[C:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>\p\flexroot\git\flex-utilities\ant_on_air\src\org\apache\flex\ant\tags
> >>>>>\sup
> >>>> >portClasses\TagHandler.as:73]
> >>>> >at org.apache.flex.ant.tags::Equals/get
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>arg1()[C:\p\flexroot\git\flex-utilities\ant_on_air\src\org\apache\flex
> >>>>>\ant
> >>>> >\tags\Equals.as:43]
> >>>> >at
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>org.apache.flex.ant.tags::Equals/getValue()[C:\p\flexroot\git\flex-uti
> >>>>>liti
> >>>> >es\ant_on_air\src\org\apache\flex\ant\tags\Equals.as:64]
> >>>> >at
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>org.apache.flex.ant.tags::Not/getValue()[C:\p\flexroot\git\flex-utilit
> >>>>>ies\
> >>>> >ant_on_air\src\org\apache\flex\ant\tags\Not.as:48]
> >>>> >at org.apache.flex.ant.tags::Condition/get
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>computedValue()[C:\p\flexroot\git\flex-utilities\ant_on_air\src\org\ap
> >>>>>ache
> >>>> >\flex\ant\tags\Condition.as:63]
> >>>> >at
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>org.apache.flex.ant.tags::Condition/execute()[C:\p\flexroot\git\flex-u
> >>>>>tili
> >>>> >ties\ant_on_air\src\org\apache\flex\ant\tags\Condition.as:48]
> >>>> >at
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>org.apache.flex.ant.tags::Target/processSteps()[C:\p\flexroot\git\flex
> >>>>>-uti
> >>>> >lities\ant_on_air\src\org\apache\flex\ant\tags\Target.as:168]
> >>>> >at
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>org.apache.flex.ant::Ant/doCallback()[C:\p\flexroot\git\flex-utilities
> >>>>>\ant
> >>>> >_on_air\src\org\apache\flex\ant\Ant.as:137]
> >>>> >at
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>InstallApacheFlex/enterFrameHandler()[C:\p\flexroot\git\flex-utilities
> >>>>>\ins
> >>>> >taller\src\InstallApacheFlex.mxml:1847]
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Looks like there is some problem in parsing a particular tag.
> >>>> >
> >>>> >Thanks,
> >>>> >Om
> >>>> >
> >>>> >
> >>>> >On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 10:14 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
> >>>> ><bigosma...@gmail.com>
> >>>> >wrote:
> >>>> >
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Justin Mclean
> >>>> >><jus...@classsoftware.com>
> >>>> >> wrote:
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>> Hi,
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> > Are you still getting that error?
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> Yes.
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> > I looked at the google analytics report and I dont see it being
> >>>> >>> widespread.
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>> I don't think it's being reported in the google analytics.
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >>>
> >>>> >> Okay, I will run it through the debugger and see what's happening.
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >> Thanks,
> >>>> >> Om
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>> Justin
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>> >>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>
> >>
>
>
