This is the earlier thread where I reported the same error. Let's continue
to discuss the issue here since it has more details.
Thanks,
Om
On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 1:40 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala <bigosma...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Hmm, tried again (twice) Still getting the same exact error.
>
> Thanks,
> Om
>
> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:48 PM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>> SVN history shows some patterns that supposedly work correctly. I just
>> updated to those. Give it a try.
>>
>> On 2/9/15, 11:48 AM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Alex, any guess as to what could be happening here?
>> >
>> >Thanks,
>> >Om
>> >
>> >On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:45 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
>> ><bigosma...@gmail.com>
>> >wrote:
>> >
>> >> I added the attributes version="17.0b" versionID="17.0b"
>> >>
>> >> That doesn't seem to have fixed it.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks,
>> >> Om
>> >>
>> >> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:11 AM, OmPrakash Muppirala
>> >><bigosma...@gmail.com
>> >> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> On Mon, Feb 9, 2015 at 12:00 AM, Alex Harui <aha...@adobe.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>>> The call stack shows it is an <equals> tag. You can use the
>> >>>>expressions
>> >>>> window to view a tag instance’s xml property to see which tag it is.
>> >>>>
>> >>>> In this case, it is:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> <equals arg1="${flash.sdk.swfversion}"
>> >>>> arg2="${flash.sdk.default.swfversion}"/>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>> It appears that the install script is expecting the versionID in the
>> >>>> installer config to be 17.0b
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>> I see that "version" is set to 17.0. Should that be changed to 17.0b
>> ?
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>> Om
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>> -Alex
>> >>>>
>> >>>> On 2/8/15, 11:18 PM, "OmPrakash Muppirala" <bigosma...@gmail.com>
>> >>>>wrote:
>> >>>>
>> >>>> >Okay, I got the same error during a debug run as well. Here is the
>> >>>> stack
>> >>>> >trace:
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >TypeError: Error #1009: Cannot access a property or method of a null
>> >>>> >object
>> >>>> >reference.
>> >>>> >at
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>>
>> >>>>>org.apache.flex.ant::Ant/getValue()[C:\p\flexroot\git\flex-utilities\a
>> >>>>>nt_o
>> >>>> >n_air\src\org\apache\flex\ant\Ant.as:216]
>> >>>> >at
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>>
>> >>>>>org.apache.flex.ant.tags.supportClasses::TagHandler/getAttributeValue(
>> >>>>>)[C:
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>>
>> >>>>>\p\flexroot\git\flex-utilities\ant_on_air\src\org\apache\flex\ant\tags
>> >>>>>\sup
>> >>>> >portClasses\TagHandler.as:73]
>> >>>> >at org.apache.flex.ant.tags::Equals/get
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>>
>> >>>>>arg1()[C:\p\flexroot\git\flex-utilities\ant_on_air\src\org\apache\flex
>> >>>>>\ant
>> >>>> >\tags\Equals.as:43]
>> >>>> >at
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>>
>> >>>>>org.apache.flex.ant.tags::Equals/getValue()[C:\p\flexroot\git\flex-uti
>> >>>>>liti
>> >>>> >es\ant_on_air\src\org\apache\flex\ant\tags\Equals.as:64]
>> >>>> >at
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>>
>> >>>>>org.apache.flex.ant.tags::Not/getValue()[C:\p\flexroot\git\flex-utilit
>> >>>>>ies\
>> >>>> >ant_on_air\src\org\apache\flex\ant\tags\Not.as:48]
>> >>>> >at org.apache.flex.ant.tags::Condition/get
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>>
>> >>>>>computedValue()[C:\p\flexroot\git\flex-utilities\ant_on_air\src\org\ap
>> >>>>>ache
>> >>>> >\flex\ant\tags\Condition.as:63]
>> >>>> >at
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>>
>> >>>>>org.apache.flex.ant.tags::Condition/execute()[C:\p\flexroot\git\flex-u
>> >>>>>tili
>> >>>> >ties\ant_on_air\src\org\apache\flex\ant\tags\Condition.as:48]
>> >>>> >at
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>>
>> >>>>>org.apache.flex.ant.tags::Target/processSteps()[C:\p\flexroot\git\flex
>> >>>>>-uti
>> >>>> >lities\ant_on_air\src\org\apache\flex\ant\tags\Target.as:168]
>> >>>> >at
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>>
>> >>>>>org.apache.flex.ant::Ant/doCallback()[C:\p\flexroot\git\flex-utilities
>> >>>>>\ant
>> >>>> >_on_air\src\org\apache\flex\ant\Ant.as:137]
>> >>>> >at
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>>
>> >>>>>InstallApacheFlex/enterFrameHandler()[C:\p\flexroot\git\flex-utilities
>> >>>>>\ins
>> >>>> >taller\src\InstallApacheFlex.mxml:1847]
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >Looks like there is some problem in parsing a particular tag.
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >Thanks,
>> >>>> >Om
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 10:14 PM, OmPrakash Muppirala
>> >>>> ><bigosma...@gmail.com>
>> >>>> >wrote:
>> >>>> >
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> On Sun, Feb 8, 2015 at 10:06 PM, Justin Mclean
>> >>>> >><jus...@classsoftware.com>
>> >>>> >> wrote:
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>> Hi,
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> > Are you still getting that error?
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> Yes.
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> > I looked at the google analytics report and I dont see it
>> being
>> >>>> >>> widespread.
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>> I don't think it's being reported in the google analytics.
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >>>
>> >>>> >> Okay, I will run it through the debugger and see what's happening.
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >> Thanks,
>> >>>> >> Om
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>> Justin
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>> >>
>> >>>>
>> >>>>
>> >>>
>> >>
>>
>>
>
