OK, I’m still working out the kinks of FDB calling Falcon to evaluate expressions. That’s in the BURM code so who knows how long that will take.
-Alex On 5/29/15, 10:20 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: >Hi Alex, > >I spent some time checking if it is was possible to let the minimum of >classes to make IJ happy, it turns out that or at least seems to be the >minimum already. >The only thing I committed and not yet pushed is the factorisation of the >fixArg function, it was on my way and I don't like duplicated, confusing >or even not used code :-) > >So, I guess I will do a push by tomorrow, feel free to review / fix / >rebase on it for FDB > >Frédéric THOMAS > >> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com >> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration >> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 19:51:10 +0100 >> >> Ah yes, you make me think I didn't stub the things I could have >>probably avoid some classes from the swfutils, will do that in the week >>end >> >> Frédéric THOMAS >> >> > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration >> > Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 19:48:43 +0100 >> > >> > > I’ll try integrating your stuff then. I looked at your changes a >>few days >> > > ago and it looked reasonable. >> > >> > Thanks for that but I pushed force my branch changing some code (in >>better I hope) and the build too. >> > >> > > Just to be sure, does this still require some parts of a regular >>Flex SDK >> > > or is a FlexJS SDK now working on its own? >> > >> > Yes, the swfutils.jar but I've seen something in the build.xml that >>didn't work for me, it was a copy of the required classes to >>falcon/swfutils, maybe you can fix that along with your FDB work as If >>IIUC, you was about to do it for FDB ? >> > >> > Aso, the user still has to add the FlexJS lib as dependency in IJ >>otherwise everything is red. >> > >> > Thanks, >> > Frédéric THOMAS >> > >> > > From: aha...@adobe.com >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > > Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration >> > > Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 18:39:58 +0000 >> > > >> > > Awesome! I hope to finish up FDB this week and then work on >>packaging. >> > > I’ll try integrating your stuff then. I looked at your changes a >>few days >> > > ago and it looked reasonable. >> > > >> > > Just to be sure, does this still require some parts of a regular >>Flex SDK >> > > or is a FlexJS SDK now working on its own? >> > > >> > > -Alex >> > > >> > > On 5/28/15, 11:22 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> >>wrote: >> > > >> > > >Almost the end. >> > > > >> > > >So, to come back on this, at the moment with my current >>implementation, >> > > >we can compile Applications and Libraries and link them together >> > > >overriding the IntelliJ configuration as show here >> > > >http://snag.gy/5SzuG.jpg the second build configuarion suffixed by >>_JS >> > > >guess what, is to compile to JS, to create it, it's enough to copy >>the >> > > >first build configuration and add the -js-output-type to any of the >> > > >current valid output type. >> > > > >> > > >Not perfect and not what I was hoping but still, that's much more >>better >> > > >than using external tools and it is per build configuration, not >>one for >> > > >all of your projects. >> > > > >> > > >A better integration could happen if I find time to code an >>IntelliJ >> > > >plugin for FlexJS though, let see first how it will be adopted, the >> > > >current integration seems still pretty descent. >> > > > >> > > >So, I would like better compiler expert to review my code as it >>was my >> > > >first compiler contribution, the branch is IDEA_JS_COMPILER >>(sorry, I >> > > >forgot to prefix with ticket ID) >> > > > >> > > >Maybe it would be opportune to create a binary kit for people >>would want >> > > >to test it and return feedback, maybe we can also wait for the >>Alex work >> > > >about FDB and see how to deal better with swfutils.jar as at the >>moment >> > > >I'm using the one of the Flex SDK. >> > > > >> > > >thought ? >> > > > >> > > >Thanks, >> > > >Frédéric THOMAS >> > > > >> > > > >> > > >> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com >> > > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > > >> Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration >> > > >> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 14:41:03 +0100 >> > > >> >> > > >> The result of the empty spark.css [1] :-) >> > > >> >> > > >> If I let only the NS, it creates the swf but crashes because it >>can't >> > > >>find IStateClient2 >> > > >> >> > > >> Frédéric THOMAS >> > > >> >> > > >> [1] >> > > >> Error:[DataBindingTest]: : java.lang.NullPointerException at >> > > >>>>org.antlr.runtime.tree.BaseTreeAdaptor.isNil(BaseTreeAdaptor.java:73) >> > > >> at >> > > >>>>org.antlr.runtime.tree.CommonTreeNodeStream.nextElement(CommonTreeNodeS >>>>tr >> > > >>eam.java:104) at >> > > >>>>org.antlr.runtime.misc.LookaheadStream.fill(LookaheadStream.java:113) >> > > >> at >> > > >>>>org.antlr.runtime.misc.LookaheadStream.syncAhead(LookaheadStream.java:1 >>>>07 >> > > >>) at >> > > >>>>org.antlr.runtime.misc.LookaheadStream.LT(LookaheadStream.java:129) >> > > >>at >> > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.css.CSSTree.stylesheet(CSSTree.java:2 >>>>00 >> > > >>) at >> > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.css.CSSDocument.parse(CSSDocument.jav >>>>a: >> > > >>81) at >> > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.caches.CSSDocumentCache$CSSDocumentCa >>>>ch >> > > >>eKey2.parse(CSSDocumentCache.java:280) at >> > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.caches.CSSDocumentCache.createEntryVa >>>>lu >> > > >>e(CSSDocumentCache.java:323) at >> > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.caches.CSSDocumentCache.createEntryVa >>>>lu >> > > >>e(CSSDocumentCache.java:54) at >> > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.caches.ConcurrentCacheStoreBase.get(C >>>>on >> > > >>currentCacheStoreBase.java:69) at >> > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.css.CSSManager.getCSSFromThemes(CSSMa >>>>na >> > > >>ger.java:251) at >> > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.FlexAppSWFTarget.collectTheme >>>>s( >> > > >>FlexAppSWFTarget.java:553) at >> > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.FlexAppSWFTarget.findAllCompi >>>>la >> > > >>tionUnitsToLink(FlexAppSWFTarget.java:493) at >> > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.Target.buildAllCompilationUni >>>>ts >> > > >>(Target.java:297) at >> > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.Target.getBuiltCompilationUni >>>>tS >> > > >>et(Target.java:306) at >> > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.SWFTarget.build(SWFTarget.jav >>>>a: >> > > >>228) at >> > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.buildSWFModel(MXMLC.java:760) >> > > >> at >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.buildArtifact(MXMLC.java:746) >> > > >> at >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.compile(MXMLC.java:625) >> > > >> at >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.compile(MXMLC.java:611) >> > > >> at >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.mainNoExit(MXMLC.java:230) >> > > >> at >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.mainNoExit(MXMLC.java:198) >> > > >> at >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.execute(MXMLC.java:185) >> > > >> at flex2.tools.Tool.compile(Tool.java:62) at >> > > >>flex2.tools.Mxmlc.mxmlc(Mxmlc.java:72) at >> > > >>>>com.intellij.flex.compiler.flex4.Flex4Handler.compileSwf(Flex4Handler.j >>>>av >> > > >>a:81) at >> > > >>>>com.intellij.flex.compiler.CompilationThread.run(CompilationThread.java >>>>:4 >> > > >>8) >> > > >> >> > > >> > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com >> > > >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > > >> > Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration >> > > >> > Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 14:09:29 +0100 >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > Just quickly, I noticed the gist contains a different set of >> > > >>namespaces, >> > > >> > > therefore excluding all of our new components, and still had >>a theme >> > > >> > > pointing at spark.css. The flex-config.xml in a FlexJS SDK >>has a >> > > >> > > different set of manifest.xml files and nothing in the theme >>tag. >> > > >> > >> > > >> > Not sure at all it would help, my guess is that it has its own >>rule >> > > >>to write its config.xml, the only way I guess would be a plugin to >> > > >>override its behaviour. >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > And for the theme, maybe an empty Spark.css will work. >> > > >> > >> > > >> > I can try that >> > > >> > >> > > >> > Frédéric THOMAS >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > From: aha...@adobe.com >> > > >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > > >> > > Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration >> > > >> > > Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 12:58:45 +0000 >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Hi Fred, >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Just quickly, I noticed the gist contains a different set of >> > > >>namespaces, >> > > >> > > therefore excluding all of our new components, and still had >>a theme >> > > >> > > pointing at spark.css. The flex-config.xml in a FlexJS SDK >>has a >> > > >> > > different set of manifest.xml files and nothing in the theme >>tag. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > I wonder if leaving a basic-manifest.xml in the SDK folder >>will >> > > >>convince >> > > >> > > IJ to use that, or if we have to copy basic-manifest into >> > > >>mxml-manifest. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > And for the theme, maybe an empty Spark.css will work. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Thanks for digging into this, >> > > >> > > -Alex >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On 5/28/15, 3:57 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" >><webdoubl...@hotmail.com> >> > > >>wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >Actually, it is more complicated. >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >This is what it is generated by IJ: >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >https://gist.github.com/doublefx/ae135f1886cc2800c08d >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >And I added the flex-config.xml from the framework, this one >> > > >>overrides >> > > >> > > >the one of IJ apparently >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >it results: >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >Information:28/05/2015 11:16 - Compilation completed with 7 >>errors >> > > >>and 11 >> > > >> > > >warnings >> > > >> > > >>>U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\DataBindingTest.mxml >> > > >> > > >Error:(26, 19) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly >>undefined >> > > >>method >> > > >> > > >MyModel. >> > > >> > > >Warning:(30, 15) [DataBindingTest]: Definition >>models.MyModel >> > > >>could not >> > > >> > > >be found. >> > > >> > > >Error:(40, 8) [DataBindingTest]: This tag could not be >>resolved to >> > > >>an >> > > >> > > >ActionScript class. It will be ignored. >> > > >> > > >>>U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\MyInitialView.mxml >> > > >> > > >Warning:(26, 10) [DataBindingTest]: Definition >>models.MyModel >> > > >>could not >> > > >> > > >be found. >> > > >> > > >Error:(53, 24) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly >>undefined >> > > >>method >> > > >> > > >MyModel. >> > > >> > > >Error:(54, 27) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly >>undefined >> > > >>method >> > > >> > > >MyModel. >> > > >> > > >Warning:(119, 50) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not >>be able >> > > >>to >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'MyModel'. >> > > >> > > >Warning:(119, 76) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not >>be able >> > > >>to >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'stockSymbol'. >> > > >> > > >Warning:(123, 63) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not >>be able >> > > >>to >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'MyModel'. >> > > >> > > >Warning:(123, 89) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not >>be able >> > > >>to >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'responseText'. >> > > >> > > >Warning:(131, 50) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not >>be able >> > > >>to >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'MyModel'. >> > > >> > > >Warning:(131, 76) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not >>be able >> > > >>to >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'strings'. >> > > >> > > >Warning:(143, 30) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not >>be able >> > > >>to >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'MyModel'. >> > > >> > > >Warning:(143, 56) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not >>be able >> > > >>to >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'allData'. >> > > >> > > >> > > >>>>>U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\controllers\MyController >>>>>.a >> > > >>>s >> > > >> > > >Warning:(26, 11) [DataBindingTest]: Definition >>models.MyModel >> > > >>could not >> > > >> > > >be found. >> > > >> > > >Error:(61, 3) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly >>undefined >> > > >>method >> > > >> > > >MyModel. >> > > >> > > >Error:(66, 3) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly >>undefined >> > > >>method >> > > >> > > >MyModel. >> > > >> > > >Error:(71, 12) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly >>undefined >> > > >>method >> > > >> > > >MyModel. >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >But if I pass directly to Mxmlc : >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >>>>>-load-config="D:\SDKs\FlexJS\0.0.3_FP16.0_AIR16.0_en_US\frameworks\fle >>>>>x- >> > > >>>co >> > > >> > > >nfig.xml" >> > > >> > > >> > > >>>>>-output=U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\bin\DataBindingTest. >>>>>sw >> > > >>>f >> > > >> > > >> > > >>>>>-library-path+=U:/sources/flexJsProjects/DataBindingTest/libs/libTest. >>>>>sw >> > > >>>c >> > > >> > > >>>U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\DataBindingTest.mxml >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >It builds. >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >And if I ommit the flex-config.xml from the framework, it >>results >> > > >>in >> > > >> > > >compilation error because it can't find >>mxml-2009-manifest.xml >> > > >>neither >> > > >> > > >the bundle resources, actually, the locale folder in my >>FlexJS SDK >> > > >>is >> > > >> > > >empty, it I fill it with the locales of my Flex SDK, the >> > > >>compilation >> > > >> > > >fails because the >> > > >> > > >it can't find the components from the >> > > >> > > >> > > >>>>>D:\SDKs\FlexJS\0.0.3_FP16.0_AIR16.0_en_US\frameworks\themes\Spark\spar >>>>>k. >> > > >>>cs >> > > >> > > >s >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >Frédéric THOMAS >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com >> > > >> > > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > > >> > > >> Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration >> > > >> > > >> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 08:47:26 +0100 >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> Hi, >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> Adding support for Comp C / JSC, I've been able to >>compile swc >> > > >>and js >> > > >> > > >>files from IntelliJ. >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> In IntelliJ, I still have to add the FlexJS as a Lib to >>have >> > > >>things >> > > >> > > >>green though, also, despite, it passes a correct >>config.xml, the >> > > >>MXMLC >> > > >> > > >>compiler can't find the classe in the lib (the class is in >>the >> > > >>lib and >> > > >> > > >>the lib is well referenced, I tried with both include path >>and >> > > >>external >> > > >> > > >>and had the same result), did someone already tried this >>kind of >> > > >>config ? >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> Thanks, >> > > >> > > >> Frédéric THOMAS >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > >> > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com >> > > >> > > >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > > >> > > >> > Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration >> > > >> > > >> > Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 01:12:22 +0100 >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > If you modify the Configuration class in >>flex-oem-compiler >> > > >>does it >> > > >> > > >>get >> > > >> > > >> > > used or does IJ have its own version? If you can use >>a >> > > >>modified >> > > >> > > >> > > Configuration, you might be able to change >> > > >>getCompilerConfiguration >> > > >> > > >>to >> > > >> > > >> > > call OEMUtil, or maybe some earlier call can call >>OEMUtil >> > > >>and store >> > > >> > > >>the >> > > >> > > >> > > config someplace. >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > Yeah, I was thinking to stub most of the legacy config >>and >> > > >>still make >> > > >> > > >>IJ happy. >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > Just so I understand: does this mean the FlexJS SDK >>can do >> > > >>these >> > > >> > > >>things in >> > > >> > > >> > > IJ without overlaying a regular Flex SDK or being a >>library >> > > >>within a >> > > >> > > >> > > regular Flex SDK? >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > For some reasons I didn't get yet (didn't dug into >>either, we >> > > >>still >> > > >> > > >>need to add the FlexJS Lib + FlexJS SDK >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > Frédéric THOMAS >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> > > From: aha...@adobe.com >> > > >> > > >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org >> > > >> > > >> > > Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration >> > > >> > > >> > > Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 23:58:16 +0000 >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On 5/26/15, 4:41 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" >> > > >><webdoubl...@hotmail.com> >> > > >> > > >>wrote: >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> I may not be understanding the issue, but if you >>look at >> > > >> > > >> > > >> flex2/tools/oem/internal/OEMUtil.java I believe >>there is >> > > >>code in >> > > >> > > >>there >> > > >> > > >> > > >> that calls Falcon’s MXMLC to get Falcon’s config, >>then >> > > >>populates >> > > >> > > >> > > >> CompilerConfiguration from the Falcon config. >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >IJ calls the proccessConfiguration which returns a >>legacy >> > > >> > > >>Configuration >> > > >> > > >> > > >nd from there IJ getCompilerConfiguration(), so, >>IFAIK, I >> > > >>can't use >> > > >> > > >> > > >OEMUtil to give it directly. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > If you modify the Configuration class in >>flex-oem-compiler >> > > >>does it >> > > >> > > >>get >> > > >> > > >> > > used or does IJ have its own version? If you can use >>a >> > > >>modified >> > > >> > > >> > > Configuration, you might be able to change >> > > >>getCompilerConfiguration >> > > >> > > >>to >> > > >> > > >> > > call OEMUtil, or maybe some earlier call can call >>OEMUtil >> > > >>and store >> > > >> > > >>the >> > > >> > > >> > > config someplace. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >Anyway, good news, I can now make / build / compile >>from >> > > >>IntelliJ >> > > >> > > >>to .swf >> > > >> > > >> > > >/ .js >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Just so I understand: does this mean the FlexJS SDK >>can do >> > > >>these >> > > >> > > >>things in >> > > >> > > >> > > IJ without overlaying a regular Flex SDK or being a >>library >> > > >>within a >> > > >> > > >> > > regular Flex SDK? >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >It is too late for me to try to adapt and make it >>build >> > > >>with Ant >> > > >> > > >>tonight >> > > >> > > >> > > >though, I'll keep you in touch. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Hey, this is great progress. I’m going to be a while >>on the >> > > >>FDB for >> > > >> > > >> > > Falcon so no hurry. >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -Alex >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> > > >> >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > >> > > >> >> > > > >> > > >> > >> >
