Ok good luck :) 1 question though, did you plan to re-apply all the fix from the sdk\modules\debugger when done ?
Btw I pushed what I hope is my last commit on my compiler branch. Frédéric THOMAS > From: aha...@adobe.com > To: webdoubl...@hotmail.com; dev@flex.apache.org > Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration > Date: Sat, 30 May 2015 15:05:45 +0000 > > There was a class missing from the donation that looked like it abstracted > as4 and as3. I've been trying to figure out what it does. I think I'll get it > done tonight. I was passing the burm the top of the ast. I think it wants a > child node. > > > Sent from my LG G3, an AT&T 4G LTE smartphone > > > ------ Original message------ > > From: Frédéric THOMAS > > Date: Sat, May 30, 2015 7:42 AM > > To: dev@flex.apache.org<mailto:dev@flex.apache.org>; > > Subject:RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration > > > Hi Alex, > > Are you saying the AS3DebuggerReducer doesn't work ? > > Frédéric THOMAS > > > From: aha...@adobe.com > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration > > Date: Fri, 29 May 2015 18:09:10 +0000 > > > > OK, I’m still working out the kinks of FDB calling Falcon to evaluate > > expressions. That’s in the BURM code so who knows how long that will take. > > > > -Alex > > > > On 5/29/15, 10:20 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote: > > > > >Hi Alex, > > > > > >I spent some time checking if it is was possible to let the minimum of > > >classes to make IJ happy, it turns out that or at least seems to be the > > >minimum already. > > >The only thing I committed and not yet pushed is the factorisation of the > > >fixArg function, it was on my way and I don't like duplicated, confusing > > >or even not used code :-) > > > > > >So, I guess I will do a push by tomorrow, feel free to review / fix / > > >rebase on it for FDB > > > > > >Frédéric THOMAS > > > > > >> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org > > >> Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration > > >> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 19:51:10 +0100 > > >> > > >> Ah yes, you make me think I didn't stub the things I could have > > >>probably avoid some classes from the swfutils, will do that in the week > > >>end > > >> > > >> Frédéric THOMAS > > >> > > >> > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > > >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > >> > Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration > > >> > Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 19:48:43 +0100 > > >> > > > >> > > I’ll try integrating your stuff then. I looked at your changes a > > >>few days > > >> > > ago and it looked reasonable. > > >> > > > >> > Thanks for that but I pushed force my branch changing some code (in > > >>better I hope) and the build too. > > >> > > > >> > > Just to be sure, does this still require some parts of a regular > > >>Flex SDK > > >> > > or is a FlexJS SDK now working on its own? > > >> > > > >> > Yes, the swfutils.jar but I've seen something in the build.xml that > > >>didn't work for me, it was a copy of the required classes to > > >>falcon/swfutils, maybe you can fix that along with your FDB work as If > > >>IIUC, you was about to do it for FDB ? > > >> > > > >> > Aso, the user still has to add the FlexJS lib as dependency in IJ > > >>otherwise everything is red. > > >> > > > >> > Thanks, > > >> > Frédéric THOMAS > > >> > > > >> > > From: aha...@adobe.com > > >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > >> > > Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration > > >> > > Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 18:39:58 +0000 > > >> > > > > >> > > Awesome! I hope to finish up FDB this week and then work on > > >>packaging. > > >> > > I’ll try integrating your stuff then. I looked at your changes a > > >>few days > > >> > > ago and it looked reasonable. > > >> > > > > >> > > Just to be sure, does this still require some parts of a regular > > >>Flex SDK > > >> > > or is a FlexJS SDK now working on its own? > > >> > > > > >> > > -Alex > > >> > > > > >> > > On 5/28/15, 11:22 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > > >>wrote: > > >> > > > > >> > > >Almost the end. > > >> > > > > > >> > > >So, to come back on this, at the moment with my current > > >>implementation, > > >> > > >we can compile Applications and Libraries and link them together > > >> > > >overriding the IntelliJ configuration as show here > > >> > > >http://snag.gy/5SzuG.jpg the second build configuarion suffixed by > > >>_JS > > >> > > >guess what, is to compile to JS, to create it, it's enough to copy > > >>the > > >> > > >first build configuration and add the -js-output-type to any of the > > >> > > >current valid output type. > > >> > > > > > >> > > >Not perfect and not what I was hoping but still, that's much more > > >>better > > >> > > >than using external tools and it is per build configuration, not > > >>one for > > >> > > >all of your projects. > > >> > > > > > >> > > >A better integration could happen if I find time to code an > > >>IntelliJ > > >> > > >plugin for FlexJS though, let see first how it will be adopted, the > > >> > > >current integration seems still pretty descent. > > >> > > > > > >> > > >So, I would like better compiler expert to review my code as it > > >>was my > > >> > > >first compiler contribution, the branch is IDEA_JS_COMPILER > > >>(sorry, I > > >> > > >forgot to prefix with ticket ID) > > >> > > > > > >> > > >Maybe it would be opportune to create a binary kit for people > > >>would want > > >> > > >to test it and return feedback, maybe we can also wait for the > > >>Alex work > > >> > > >about FDB and see how to deal better with swfutils.jar as at the > > >>moment > > >> > > >I'm using the one of the Flex SDK. > > >> > > > > > >> > > >thought ? > > >> > > > > > >> > > >Thanks, > > >> > > >Frédéric THOMAS > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > > >> > > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org > > >> > > >> Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration > > >> > > >> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 14:41:03 +0100 > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> The result of the empty spark.css [1] :-) > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> If I let only the NS, it creates the swf but crashes because it > > >>can't > > >> > > >>find IStateClient2 > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Frédéric THOMAS > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> [1] > > >> > > >> Error:[DataBindingTest]: : java.lang.NullPointerException at > > >> > > > > >>>>org.antlr.runtime.tree.BaseTreeAdaptor.isNil(BaseTreeAdaptor.java:73) > > >> > > >> at > > >> > > > > >>>>org.antlr.runtime.tree.CommonTreeNodeStream.nextElement(CommonTreeNodeS > > >>>>tr > > >> > > >>eam.java:104) at > > >> > > > > >>>>org.antlr.runtime.misc.LookaheadStream.fill(LookaheadStream.java:113) > > >> > > >> at > > >> > > > > >>>>org.antlr.runtime.misc.LookaheadStream.syncAhead(LookaheadStream.java:1 > > >>>>07 > > >> > > >>) at > > >> > > > > >>>>org.antlr.runtime.misc.LookaheadStream.LT(LookaheadStream.java:129) > > >> > > >>at > > >> > > > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.css.CSSTree.stylesheet(CSSTree.java:2 > > >>>>00 > > >> > > >>) at > > >> > > > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.css.CSSDocument.parse(CSSDocument.jav > > >>>>a: > > >> > > >>81) at > > >> > > > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.caches.CSSDocumentCache$CSSDocumentCa > > >>>>ch > > >> > > >>eKey2.parse(CSSDocumentCache.java:280) at > > >> > > > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.caches.CSSDocumentCache.createEntryVa > > >>>>lu > > >> > > >>e(CSSDocumentCache.java:323) at > > >> > > > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.caches.CSSDocumentCache.createEntryVa > > >>>>lu > > >> > > >>e(CSSDocumentCache.java:54) at > > >> > > > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.caches.ConcurrentCacheStoreBase.get(C > > >>>>on > > >> > > >>currentCacheStoreBase.java:69) at > > >> > > > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.css.CSSManager.getCSSFromThemes(CSSMa > > >>>>na > > >> > > >>ger.java:251) at > > >> > > > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.FlexAppSWFTarget.collectTheme > > >>>>s( > > >> > > >>FlexAppSWFTarget.java:553) at > > >> > > > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.FlexAppSWFTarget.findAllCompi > > >>>>la > > >> > > >>tionUnitsToLink(FlexAppSWFTarget.java:493) at > > >> > > > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.Target.buildAllCompilationUni > > >>>>ts > > >> > > >>(Target.java:297) at > > >> > > > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.Target.getBuiltCompilationUni > > >>>>tS > > >> > > >>et(Target.java:306) at > > >> > > > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.internal.targets.SWFTarget.build(SWFTarget.jav > > >>>>a: > > >> > > >>228) at > > >> > > > > >>>>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.buildSWFModel(MXMLC.java:760) > > >> > > >> at > > >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.buildArtifact(MXMLC.java:746) > > >> > > >> at > > >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.compile(MXMLC.java:625) > > >> > > >> at > > >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.compile(MXMLC.java:611) > > >> > > >> at > > >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.mainNoExit(MXMLC.java:230) > > >> > > >> at > > >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.mainNoExit(MXMLC.java:198) > > >> > > >> at > > >>org.apache.flex.compiler.clients.MXMLC.execute(MXMLC.java:185) > > >> > > >> at flex2.tools.Tool.compile(Tool.java:62) at > > >> > > >>flex2.tools.Mxmlc.mxmlc(Mxmlc.java:72) at > > >> > > > > >>>>com.intellij.flex.compiler.flex4.Flex4Handler.compileSwf(Flex4Handler.j > > >>>>av > > >> > > >>a:81) at > > >> > > > > >>>>com.intellij.flex.compiler.CompilationThread.run(CompilationThread.java > > >>>>:4 > > >> > > >>8) > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > > >> > > >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > >> > > >> > Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration > > >> > > >> > Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 14:09:29 +0100 > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > Just quickly, I noticed the gist contains a different set of > > >> > > >>namespaces, > > >> > > >> > > therefore excluding all of our new components, and still had > > >>a theme > > >> > > >> > > pointing at spark.css. The flex-config.xml in a FlexJS SDK > > >>has a > > >> > > >> > > different set of manifest.xml files and nothing in the theme > > >>tag. > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > Not sure at all it would help, my guess is that it has its own > > >>rule > > >> > > >>to write its config.xml, the only way I guess would be a plugin to > > >> > > >>override its behaviour. > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > And for the theme, maybe an empty Spark.css will work. > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > I can try that > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > Frédéric THOMAS > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > From: aha...@adobe.com > > >> > > >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > >> > > >> > > Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration > > >> > > >> > > Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 12:58:45 +0000 > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > Hi Fred, > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > Just quickly, I noticed the gist contains a different set of > > >> > > >>namespaces, > > >> > > >> > > therefore excluding all of our new components, and still had > > >>a theme > > >> > > >> > > pointing at spark.css. The flex-config.xml in a FlexJS SDK > > >>has a > > >> > > >> > > different set of manifest.xml files and nothing in the theme > > >>tag. > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > I wonder if leaving a basic-manifest.xml in the SDK folder > > >>will > > >> > > >>convince > > >> > > >> > > IJ to use that, or if we have to copy basic-manifest into > > >> > > >>mxml-manifest. > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > And for the theme, maybe an empty Spark.css will work. > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > Thanks for digging into this, > > >> > > >> > > -Alex > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > On 5/28/15, 3:57 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" > > >><webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > > >> > > >>wrote: > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >Actually, it is more complicated. > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >This is what it is generated by IJ: > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >https://gist.github.com/doublefx/ae135f1886cc2800c08d > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >And I added the flex-config.xml from the framework, this one > > >> > > >>overrides > > >> > > >> > > >the one of IJ apparently > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >it results: > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >Information:28/05/2015 11:16 - Compilation completed with 7 > > >>errors > > >> > > >>and 11 > > >> > > >> > > >warnings > > >> > > >> > > > > >>>U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\DataBindingTest.mxml > > >> > > >> > > >Error:(26, 19) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly > > >>undefined > > >> > > >>method > > >> > > >> > > >MyModel. > > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(30, 15) [DataBindingTest]: Definition > > >>models.MyModel > > >> > > >>could not > > >> > > >> > > >be found. > > >> > > >> > > >Error:(40, 8) [DataBindingTest]: This tag could not be > > >>resolved to > > >> > > >>an > > >> > > >> > > >ActionScript class. It will be ignored. > > >> > > >> > > > > >>>U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\MyInitialView.mxml > > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(26, 10) [DataBindingTest]: Definition > > >>models.MyModel > > >> > > >>could not > > >> > > >> > > >be found. > > >> > > >> > > >Error:(53, 24) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly > > >>undefined > > >> > > >>method > > >> > > >> > > >MyModel. > > >> > > >> > > >Error:(54, 27) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly > > >>undefined > > >> > > >>method > > >> > > >> > > >MyModel. > > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(119, 50) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not > > >>be able > > >> > > >>to > > >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'MyModel'. > > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(119, 76) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not > > >>be able > > >> > > >>to > > >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'stockSymbol'. > > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(123, 63) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not > > >>be able > > >> > > >>to > > >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'MyModel'. > > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(123, 89) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not > > >>be able > > >> > > >>to > > >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'responseText'. > > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(131, 50) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not > > >>be able > > >> > > >>to > > >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'MyModel'. > > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(131, 76) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not > > >>be able > > >> > > >>to > > >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'strings'. > > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(143, 30) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not > > >>be able > > >> > > >>to > > >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'MyModel'. > > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(143, 56) [DataBindingTest]: Data binding will not > > >>be able > > >> > > >>to > > >> > > >> > > >detect assignments to 'allData'. > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >>>>>U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\controllers\MyController > > >>>>>.a > > >> > > >>>s > > >> > > >> > > >Warning:(26, 11) [DataBindingTest]: Definition > > >>models.MyModel > > >> > > >>could not > > >> > > >> > > >be found. > > >> > > >> > > >Error:(61, 3) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly > > >>undefined > > >> > > >>method > > >> > > >> > > >MyModel. > > >> > > >> > > >Error:(66, 3) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly > > >>undefined > > >> > > >>method > > >> > > >> > > >MyModel. > > >> > > >> > > >Error:(71, 12) [DataBindingTest]: Call to a possibly > > >>undefined > > >> > > >>method > > >> > > >> > > >MyModel. > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >But if I pass directly to Mxmlc : > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >>>>>-load-config="D:\SDKs\FlexJS\0.0.3_FP16.0_AIR16.0_en_US\frameworks\fle > > >>>>>x- > > >> > > >>>co > > >> > > >> > > >nfig.xml" > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >>>>>-output=U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\bin\DataBindingTest. > > >>>>>sw > > >> > > >>>f > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >>>>>-library-path+=U:/sources/flexJsProjects/DataBindingTest/libs/libTest. > > >>>>>sw > > >> > > >>>c > > >> > > >> > > > > >>>U:\sources\flexJsProjects\DataBindingTest\src\DataBindingTest.mxml > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >It builds. > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >And if I ommit the flex-config.xml from the framework, it > > >>results > > >> > > >>in > > >> > > >> > > >compilation error because it can't find > > >>mxml-2009-manifest.xml > > >> > > >>neither > > >> > > >> > > >the bundle resources, actually, the locale folder in my > > >>FlexJS SDK > > >> > > >>is > > >> > > >> > > >empty, it I fill it with the locales of my Flex SDK, the > > >> > > >>compilation > > >> > > >> > > >fails because the > > >> > > >> > > >it can't find the components from the > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > > > >>>>>D:\SDKs\FlexJS\0.0.3_FP16.0_AIR16.0_en_US\frameworks\themes\Spark\spar > > >>>>>k. > > >> > > >>>cs > > >> > > >> > > >s > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >Frédéric THOMAS > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > > >> > > >> > > >> To: dev@flex.apache.org > > >> > > >> > > >> Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration > > >> > > >> > > >> Date: Thu, 28 May 2015 08:47:26 +0100 > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Hi, > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Adding support for Comp C / JSC, I've been able to > > >>compile swc > > >> > > >>and js > > >> > > >> > > >>files from IntelliJ. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> In IntelliJ, I still have to add the FlexJS as a Lib to > > >>have > > >> > > >>things > > >> > > >> > > >>green though, also, despite, it passes a correct > > >>config.xml, the > > >> > > >>MXMLC > > >> > > >> > > >>compiler can't find the classe in the lib (the class is in > > >>the > > >> > > >>lib and > > >> > > >> > > >>the lib is well referenced, I tried with both include path > > >>and > > >> > > >>external > > >> > > >> > > >>and had the same result), did someone already tried this > > >>kind of > > >> > > >>config ? > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> Thanks, > > >> > > >> > > >> Frédéric THOMAS > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > From: webdoubl...@hotmail.com > > >> > > >> > > >> > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > >> > > >> > > >> > Subject: RE: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration > > >> > > >> > > >> > Date: Wed, 27 May 2015 01:12:22 +0100 > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > If you modify the Configuration class in > > >>flex-oem-compiler > > >> > > >>does it > > >> > > >> > > >>get > > >> > > >> > > >> > > used or does IJ have its own version? If you can use > > >>a > > >> > > >>modified > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Configuration, you might be able to change > > >> > > >>getCompilerConfiguration > > >> > > >> > > >>to > > >> > > >> > > >> > > call OEMUtil, or maybe some earlier call can call > > >>OEMUtil > > >> > > >>and store > > >> > > >> > > >>the > > >> > > >> > > >> > > config someplace. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > Yeah, I was thinking to stub most of the legacy config > > >>and > > >> > > >>still make > > >> > > >> > > >>IJ happy. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Just so I understand: does this mean the FlexJS SDK > > >>can do > > >> > > >>these > > >> > > >> > > >>things in > > >> > > >> > > >> > > IJ without overlaying a regular Flex SDK or being a > > >>library > > >> > > >>within a > > >> > > >> > > >> > > regular Flex SDK? > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > For some reasons I didn't get yet (didn't dug into > > >>either, we > > >> > > >>still > > >> > > >> > > >>need to add the FlexJS Lib + FlexJS SDK > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > Frédéric THOMAS > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > From: aha...@adobe.com > > >> > > >> > > >> > > To: dev@flex.apache.org > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Subject: Re: AW: AW: AW: [FlexJS] IntelliJ Integration > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Date: Tue, 26 May 2015 23:58:16 +0000 > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > On 5/26/15, 4:41 PM, "Frédéric THOMAS" > > >> > > >><webdoubl...@hotmail.com> > > >> > > >> > > >>wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> I may not be understanding the issue, but if you > > >>look at > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> flex2/tools/oem/internal/OEMUtil.java I believe > > >>there is > > >> > > >>code in > > >> > > >> > > >>there > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> that calls Falcon’s MXMLC to get Falcon’s config, > > >>then > > >> > > >>populates > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> CompilerConfiguration from the Falcon config. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >IJ calls the proccessConfiguration which returns a > > >>legacy > > >> > > >> > > >>Configuration > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >nd from there IJ getCompilerConfiguration(), so, > > >>IFAIK, I > > >> > > >>can't use > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >OEMUtil to give it directly. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > If you modify the Configuration class in > > >>flex-oem-compiler > > >> > > >>does it > > >> > > >> > > >>get > > >> > > >> > > >> > > used or does IJ have its own version? If you can use > > >>a > > >> > > >>modified > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Configuration, you might be able to change > > >> > > >>getCompilerConfiguration > > >> > > >> > > >>to > > >> > > >> > > >> > > call OEMUtil, or maybe some earlier call can call > > >>OEMUtil > > >> > > >>and store > > >> > > >> > > >>the > > >> > > >> > > >> > > config someplace. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >Anyway, good news, I can now make / build / compile > > >>from > > >> > > >>IntelliJ > > >> > > >> > > >>to .swf > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >/ .js > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Just so I understand: does this mean the FlexJS SDK > > >>can do > > >> > > >>these > > >> > > >> > > >>things in > > >> > > >> > > >> > > IJ without overlaying a regular Flex SDK or being a > > >>library > > >> > > >>within a > > >> > > >> > > >> > > regular Flex SDK? > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >It is too late for me to try to adapt and make it > > >>build > > >> > > >>with Ant > > >> > > >> > > >>tonight > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >though, I'll keep you in touch. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Hey, this is great progress. I’m going to be a while > > >>on the > > >> > > >>FDB for > > >> > > >> > > >> > > Falcon so no hurry. > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > -Alex > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > >> > > > > >> > > >> > > > >> > > >> > > >> > > > > > >> > > > > >> > > > >> > > > > > >
