> Volunteers are welcome to try to fix it. Or implement a whole new
> incremental compile strategy. I think I’ve noticed that Java compiler
> writes out an .class file and uses file dates to determine whether to
> compile again and seems to do that very quickly. I’ve pondered whether
> Falcon would get similar gains if we wrote out .abc files.
So, it seems the compiler maintains a kind of session between the compilation,
how ?
So, why to generate the .abc and compare its modify date while we can do that
with the source file ?
Frédéric THOMAS
----------------------------------------
> From: aha...@adobe.com
> To: dev@flex.apache.org
> Subject: Re: [FalconJX] Unit test shows full use of pure actionscript to
> javascript compile
> Date: Wed, 10 Jun 2015 15:17:55 +0000
>
>
>
> On 6/10/15, 6:46 AM, "Frédéric THOMAS" <webdoubl...@hotmail.com> wrote:
>
>>For better performances, we would need to make the incremental
>>compilation to work but for instance, IIRC Alex switched it off because
>>it didn't work well.
>
> Volunteers are welcome to try to fix it. Or implement a whole new
> incremental compile strategy. I think I’ve noticed that Java compiler
> writes out an .class file and uses file dates to determine whether to
> compile again and seems to do that very quickly. I’ve pondered whether
> Falcon would get similar gains if we wrote out .abc files.
>
> Anyway, I will be working on packaging up all of Mike’s work so it is
> easier to use from the nightly builds.
>
> -Alex
>
